Literature DB >> 19398325

Cost comparison study of two different follow-up protocols after surgery for oesophageal cancer.

Suzanne Polinder1, Els M L Verschuur, Peter D Siersema, Ernst J Kuipers, Ewout W Steyerberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Costs of follow-up strategies in patients after surgery for oesophageal cancer have not been evaluated. We therefore randomised 109 patients to standard outpatient clinic follow-up by a surgeon (n=55) or home visits by a specialist nurse (n=54) and compared costs between these two strategies.
METHOD: Cost comparisons included comprehensive data on hospital costs, diagnostic interventions and extramural care. Detailed information on health care consumption was obtained from a case record form at 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after randomisation.
RESULTS: Total medical costs were lower for nurse-led follow-up (euro 2592 versus euro 3798) than standard follow-up, although this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.11). This advantage in the nurse-led follow-up group was mainly due to lower costs for follow-up visits (euro 234 versus euro 503; p<0.001), and a trend towards lower costs for total intramural care (euro 1477 versus euro 2277; p=0.19).
CONCLUSION: Nurse-led follow-up of patients after oesophageal cancer surgery is likely to be cost effective and may even generate cost savings. The results of this study further support a specific role of nurses in the medical care of patients with malignant diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19398325     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  7 in total

1.  Newly developed primary malignancies in long-term survivors who underwent curative esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  Dai Shimizu; Masahiko Koike; Mitsuro Kanda; Fuminori Sonohara; Norifumi Hattori; Masamichi Hayashi; Chie Tanaka; Suguru Yamada; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Nurse-led follow-up care for cancer patients: what is known and what is needed.

Authors:  Jacqueline de Leeuw; Maria Larsson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  The effectiveness of telephone and internet-based supportive care for patients with esophageal cancer on enhanced recovery after surgery in China: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yuan Yu; Min Li; Ran Kang; Xinzhe Liu; Nuoxiaoxuan Wang; Qingmiao Zhu; Jun Cao; Minghua Cong
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2022-03-05

Review 4.  Oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Smyth; Jesper Lagergren; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Florian Lordick; Manish A Shah; Pernilla Lagergren; David Cunningham
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 52.329

5.  Review of the home care programmes for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prophylaxis in Ireland and The Netherlands.

Authors:  Barbara Whelan; Elles Musters; Amanda Murray; Eilish Moore; Lenie Lievaart; Sjoerd Visser; Esther Toxopeus; Annemarie van Veen; Gerard Notario; Fiona J Campbell
Journal:  Drugs Ther Perspect       Date:  2016-01-26

6.  The costs, resource use and cost-effectiveness of Clinical Nurse Specialist-led interventions for patients with palliative care needs: A systematic review of international evidence.

Authors:  Natalia Salamanca-Balen; Jane Seymour; Glenys Caswell; David Whynes; Angela Tod
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.762

7.  Follow-up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors.

Authors:  Beverley L Høeg; Pernille E Bidstrup; Randi V Karlsen; Anne Sofie Friberg; Vanna Albieri; Susanne O Dalton; Lena Saltbæk; Klaus Kaae Andersen; Trine Allerslev Horsboel; Christoffer Johansen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.