Literature DB >> 19397866

Adaptation of eye-movements to simulated hemianopia in reading and visual exploration: Transfer or specificity?

Susanne Schuett1, Robert W Kentridge, Josef Zihl, Charles A Heywood.   

Abstract

Reading and visual exploration impairments in unilateral homonymous hemianopia are well-established clinical phenomena. Spontaneous adaptation of eye-movements to the visual field defect leads to improved reading and visual exploration performance. Yet, it is still unclear whether oculomotor adaptation to visual field loss is task-specific or whether there is a transfer of adaptation-related improvements between reading and visual exploration. We therefore simulated unilateral homonymous hemianopia in healthy participants and explored the specificity with which oculomotor adaptation to this pure visual-sensory dysfunction during uninstructed reading or visual exploration practice leads to improvements in both abilities. Our findings demonstrate that there is no transfer of adaptation-related changes of eye-movements and performance improvements between reading and visual exploration. Efficient oculomotor adaptation to visual field loss is highly specific and task-dependent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19397866     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  11 in total

1.  Eye-movement training-induced changes of visual field representation in patients with post-stroke hemianopia.

Authors:  Gereon Nelles; Anja Pscherer; Armin de Greiff; Horst Gerhard; Michael Forsting; Joachim Esser; H Christoph Diener
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  The impact of simulated hemianopia on visual search for faces, words, and cars.

Authors:  Vahideh Manouchehri; Andrea Albonico; Jennifer Hemström; Sarra Djouab; Hyeongmin Kim; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Compensatory strategies following visual search training in patients with homonymous hemianopia: an eye movement study.

Authors:  Sabira K Mannan; Alidz L M Pambakian; Christopher Kennard
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  The rehabilitation of hemianopic dyslexia.

Authors:  Susanne Schuett
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  Homonymous Visual Field Loss and Its Impact on Visual Exploration: A Supermarket Study.

Authors:  Enkelejda Kasneci; Katrin Sippel; Martin Heister; Katrin Aehling; Wolfgang Rosenstiel; Ulrich Schiefer; Elena Papageorgiou
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 6.  Visualizing the blind brain: brain imaging of visual field defects from early recovery to rehabilitation techniques.

Authors:  Marika Urbanski; Olivier A Coubard; Clémence Bourlon
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-30

Review 7.  Eye-Tracking as a Tool to Evaluate Functional Ability in Everyday Tasks in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Enkelejda Kasneci; Alex A Black; Joanne M Wood
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Biomechanical adaptation to post-stroke visual field loss: a systematic review.

Authors:  Adel Elfeky; Kristiaan D'Août; Rebecca Lawson; Lauren R Hepworth; Nicholas D A Thomas; Abigail Clynch; Fiona J Rowe
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-27

9.  Gaze movements and spatial working memory in collision avoidance: a traffic intersection task.

Authors:  Gregor Hardiess; Sabrina Hansmann-Roth; Hanspeter A Mallot
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Binocular glaucomatous visual field loss and its impact on visual exploration--a supermarket study.

Authors:  Katrin Sippel; Enkelejda Kasneci; Kathrin Aehling; Martin Heister; Wolfgang Rosenstiel; Ulrich Schiefer; Elena Papageorgiou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.