Literature DB >> 19397637

Prospective clinical evaluation of 1920 Morse taper connection implants: results after 4 years of functional loading.

C Mangano1, F Mangano, A Piattelli, G Iezzi, A Mangano, L La Colla.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the survival rate and the clinical, radiographic and prosthetic success of 1920 Morse taper connection implants.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: One thousand nine hundred and twenty Morse taper connection implants were inserted in 689 consecutive patients, from January 2003 until December 2006. Implants were clinically and radiographically evaluated at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after insertion (mean follow-up per implant: 25.42 months). Modified plaque index (mPI), modified sulcus bleeding index, probing depth (PD) and the distance between implant shoulder and first crestal bone-implant contact (DIB) were measured in mm. Success criteria included the absence of suppuration and clinically detectable implant mobility, PD<5 mm, DIB<1.5 mm after 12 months of functional loading and not exceeding 0.2 mm for each following year, the absence of recurrent prosthetic complications at the implant-abutment interface. Prosthetic restorations were fixed partial prostheses (364 units), single crowns (SCs: 307 units), fixed full-arch prostheses (53 units) and overdentures (67 units).
RESULTS: The overall cumulative implant survival rate was 97.56% (96.12% in the maxilla and 98.91% in the mandible). The cumulative implant success rate was 96.61% (95.25% in the maxilla and 98.64% in the mandible). Only a few prosthetic complications were reported (0.65% of loosening at implant-abutment interface in SCs).
CONCLUSION: The use of Morse taper connection implants represents a successful procedure for the rehabilitation of partially and completely edentulous arches. The absence of an implant-abutment interface (microgap) is associated with minimal crestal bone loss. The high mechanical stability significantly reduces prosthetic complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19397637     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01649.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  11 in total

1.  In Vitro Study of Preload Loss in Different Implant Abutment Connection Designs.

Authors:  Ana Sofia Vinhas; Carlos Aroso; Filomena Salazar; Marta Relvas; Ana Cristina Braga; Blanca Ríos-Carrasco; Javier Gil; José Vicente Rios-Santos; Ana Fernández-Palacín; Mariano Herrero-Climent
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.623

2.  Effects of Osseodensification on Immediate Implant Placement: Retrospective Analysis of 211 Implants.

Authors:  Márcio de Carvalho Formiga; Kinga Grzech-Leśniak; Vittorio Moraschini; Jamil Awad Shibli; Rodrigo Neiva
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 3.748

3.  Vital pulp therapy-current progress of dental pulp regeneration and revascularization.

Authors:  Weibo Zhang; Pamela C Yelick
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2010-04-28

Review 4.  Morse taper dental implants and platform switching: The new paradigm in oral implantology.

Authors:  José Paulo Macedo; Jorge Pereira; Brendan R Vahey; Bruno Henriques; Cesar A M Benfatti; Ricardo S Magini; José López-López; Júlio C M Souza
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

5.  Marginal bone loss around non-submerged implants is associated with salivary microbiome during bone healing.

Authors:  Xiao-Bo Duan; Ting-Xi Wu; Yu-Chen Guo; Xue-Dong Zhou; Yi-Ling Lei; Xin Xu; An-Chun Mo; Yong-Yue Wang; Quan Yuan
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 6.344

6.  Volumetric Changes in Morse Taper Connections After Implant Placement in Dense Bone. In-Vitro Study.

Authors:  Georgios E Romanos; Rafael Arcesio Delgado-Ruiz; Ana I Nicolas-Silvente
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  In Vitro Bacterial Leakage at the Implant-Abutment Connection of Two Dental Implant Systems with Internal Connection.

Authors:  Azadeh Khajavi; Shabnam Mohseni; Amir Peymani; Mehrak Amjadi
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2020-12-08

8.  Comparative evaluation of peri-implant tissues in patients wearing mandibular overdenture with different implant platforms.

Authors:  Laércio Almeida de Melo; Danielle Bezerra de Farias; Annie Karoline Bezerra de Medeiros; Gustavo Augusto Seabra Barbosa; Euler Maciel Dantas; Adriana da Fonte Porto Carreiro
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec

9.  Splinted and Nonsplinted Crowns with Different Implant Lengths in the Posterior Maxilla by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo Lemos; Fellippo Ramos Verri; Joel Ferreira Santiago Junior; Victor Eduardo de Souza Batista; Daniel Takanori Kemmoku; Pedro Yoshito Noritomi; Eduardo Piza Pellizzer
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 2.682

10.  Crestal Bone Changes in Different Implants Designs: A Prospective Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Gustavo M Caetano; Patrícia Pauletto; Luis A Mezzomo; Elken G Rivaldo
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2019-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.