Literature DB >> 19397440

The complexity of double-strand break ends is a factor in the repair pathway choice.

Emil Mladenov1, Peter Kalev, Boyka Anachkova.   

Abstract

The repair of double-strand breaks in mammalian cells is carried out by two pathways: homologous recombination and nonhomologous end joining. The factors that regulate the mechanism through which a specific repair pathway is activated are still not clearly defined. To study whether the complexity of the double-strand break ends is a factor that determines the choice of the repair pathway, we examined the involvement of homologous recombination by the formation of Rad51 foci in human HeLa cells treated with bleomycin and ionizing radiation. The quantity of double-strand breaks was determined by gel electrophoresis and the formation of gamma-H2AX foci. Two hours after treatment with low doses of the agents that induced similar quantities of double-strand breaks that could be repaired effectively by the cells, Rad51 foci were observed only in the irradiated cells. Rad51 foci appeared in bleomycin-treated cells after prolonged exposure to the drug when the cells were arrested in the G2 phase of the cell cycle. Since bleomycin produces double-strand breaks that are less complex than the breaks induced by ionizing radiation, these results indicate that the complexity of the break ends is a factor in the choice of repair pathway and that homologous recombination is recruited in the repair of breaks with more complex multiply damaged ends during the late S and G2 phases of the cell cycle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19397440     DOI: 10.1667/RR1487.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  7 in total

1.  Mechanism of radiosensitization by the Chk1/2 inhibitor AZD7762 involves abrogation of the G2 checkpoint and inhibition of homologous recombinational DNA repair.

Authors:  Meredith A Morgan; Leslie A Parsels; Lili Zhao; Joshua D Parsels; Mary A Davis; Maria C Hassan; Sankari Arumugarajah; Linda Hylander-Gans; Deborah Morosini; Diane M Simeone; Christine E Canman; Daniel P Normolle; Sonya D Zabludoff; Jonathan Maybaum; Theodore S Lawrence
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Investigation of the functional link between ATM and NBS1 in the DNA damage response in the mouse cerebellum.

Authors:  Inbal Dar; Galit Yosha; Ronen Elfassy; Ronit Galron; Zhao-Qi Wang; Yosef Shiloh; Ari Barzilai
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Shorter exposures to harder X-rays trigger early apoptotic events in Xenopus laevis embryos.

Authors:  JiaJia Dong; Sean P Mury; Karen E Drahos; Marko Moscovitch; Royce K P Zia; Carla V Finkielstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Genomic stability in response to high versus low linear energy transfer radiation in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Neil D Huefner; Kaoru Yoshiyama; Joanna D Friesner; Phillip A Conklin; Anne B Britt
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Cellular responses and gene expression profile changes due to bleomycin-induced DNA damage in human fibroblasts in space.

Authors:  Tao Lu; Ye Zhang; Yared Kidane; Alan Feiveson; Louis Stodieck; Fathi Karouia; Govindarajan Ramesh; Larry Rohde; Honglu Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Differences in Phosphorylated Histone H2AX Foci Formation and Removal of Cells Exposed to Low and High Linear Energy Transfer Radiation.

Authors:  Thomas Ernst Schmid; Olga Zlobinskaya; Gabriele Multhoff
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.236

Review 7.  Effects of hyperthermia on DNA repair pathways: one treatment to inhibit them all.

Authors:  Arlene L Oei; Lianne E M Vriend; Johannes Crezee; Nicolaas A P Franken; Przemek M Krawczyk
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.481

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.