Literature DB >> 19396717

Hair removal with a novel, low fluence, home-use intense pulsed light device.

Russell Emerson1, Godfrey Town.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reduction in unwanted body and facial hair at various body sites of Fitzpatrick skin types I-III and the efficacy, comfort and safety of this treatment intended for home-use by the general public.
METHODS: In this non-randomized study, 29 individuals were given three sequential weekly treatments on a total of 31 body and facial areas including the axilla, bikini area, abdomen, neck, chin and upper lip using a novel intense pulsed light device. All participants completed a simple self-assessment questionnaire, as well as an evaluation of pain/discomfort.
RESULTS: The mean reduction in terminal hair counts was 47% at 4 weeks' follow-up and 41% at 6 months' follow-up after completing three sequential weekly treatments. Overall, 84% of participants showed a significant percentage of hair reduction (p<0.01) at the 6-month follow-up, with a mean of 51% (range 25-86%). No treatment-related side effects were reported, with little or no discomfort reported during the treatment. Only mild erythema was noted immediately post-treatment. In total, 85% of the participants were either pleased or very pleased with the results 1 month after the third treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: In simulated consumer use, this home-use IPL demonstrated a significant, quantifiable and sustainable reduction in unwanted body and facial hair with minimal side effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19396717     DOI: 10.1080/14764170902792199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cosmet Laser Ther        ISSN: 1476-4172            Impact factor:   2.247


  3 in total

Review 1.  Are home-use intense pulsed light (IPL) devices safe?

Authors:  Godfrey Town; Caerwyn Ash
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Ultraviolet radiation after exposure to a low-fluence IPL home-use device: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Daniel Thaysen-Petersen; Andres M Erlendsson; J F Nash; Frank Beerwerth; Peter A Philipsen; Hans C Wulf; Merete Haedersdal
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Home-based devices in dermatology: a systematic review of safety and efficacy.

Authors:  Marc Cohen; Evan Austin; Natasha Masub; Alana Kurtti; Christopher George; Jared Jagdeo
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.017

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.