Literature DB >> 19396651

Patient preference compared with random allocation in short-term psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy with indicated addition of pharmacotherapy for depression.

Henricus L Van1, Jack Dekker, Jurrijn Koelen, Simone Kool, Gerda van Aalst, Marielle Hendriksen, Jaap Peen, Robert Schoevers.   

Abstract

Depressed patients randomized to psychotherapy were compared with those who had been chosen for psychotherapy in a treatment algorithm, including addition of an antidepressant in case of early nonresponse. There were no differences between randomized and by-preference patients at baseline in adherence and outcome. About half of the early nonresponders refused the additional medication. However, no clear effect of medication addition on ultimate outcome could be demonstrated. In total, 37% of the patients achieved remission. The study suggested that randomization of patients does not induce a great influence on outcome. It might be warranted to continue an initially ineffective psychotherapy for depression, because a considerable number of patients do have a pattern of delayed response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19396651     DOI: 10.1080/10503300802702097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychother Res        ISSN: 1050-3307


  7 in total

Review 1.  Outcomes for patients with the same disease treated inside and outside of randomized trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Natasha Fernandes; Dianne Bryant; Lauren Griffith; Mohamed El-Rabbany; Nisha M Fernandes; Crystal Kean; Jacquelyn Marsh; Siddhi Mathur; Rebecca Moyer; Clare J Reade; John J Riva; Lyndsay Somerville; Neera Bhatnagar
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Client preferences affect treatment satisfaction, completion, and clinical outcome: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Oliver Lindhiem; Charles B Bennett; Christopher J Trentacosta; Caitlin McLear
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-06-16

3.  Patient preferences for treatment of major depressive disorder and the impact on health outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Heather L Gelhorn; Chris C Sexton; Peter M Classi
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2011

4.  Association of Patient Treatment Preference With Dropout and Clinical Outcomes in Adult Psychosocial Mental Health Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emma Windle; Helena Tee; Alina Sabitova; Nikolina Jovanovic; Stefan Priebe; Catherine Carr
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 21.596

Review 5.  Patient preference for psychological vs pharmacologic treatment of psychiatric disorders: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  R Kathryn McHugh; Sarah W Whitton; Andrew D Peckham; Jeffrey A Welge; Michael W Otto
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.384

Review 6.  Should treatment for depression be based more on patient preference?

Authors:  Sophia E Winter; Jacques P Barber
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 2.711

7.  Evidence-based, non-pharmacological treatment guideline for depression in Korea.

Authors:  Seon-Cheol Park; Hong Seok Oh; Dong-Hoon Oh; Seung Ah Jung; Kyoung-Sae Na; Hwa-Young Lee; Ree-Hun Kang; Yun-Kyeung Choi; Min-Soo Lee; Yong Chon Park
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 2.153

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.