Literature DB >> 19396650

The evaluation of supervision: construction of brief questionnaires for the supervisor and the supervisee.

Gerhard Zarbock1, Marko Drews, Alexander Bodansky, Bernhard Dahme.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the psychometric properties of two parallel questionnaires (for the supervisor and supervisee, respectively). Ninety supervisees and 37 supervisors from different parts of Germany took part in the study. The three dimensions of clarifying, problem solving, and relationship were confirmed, but for both supervisor and supervisee versions of the scale medium intercorrelations also allowed a combined scale to be formed. In exploratory regression analysis, the relationship dimension related to both perspectives (i.e., supervisor and supervisee) served as the best predictor for overall supervision satisfaction. Despite the fact that general session satisfaction correlated in the medium range between supervisor and supervisee, there was no correlation between the perspectives as measured by the questionnaires. Possible reasons for this unexpected correlational pattern are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19396650     DOI: 10.1080/10503300802688478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychother Res        ISSN: 1050-3307


  2 in total

1.  Empirical research in clinical supervision: a systematic review and suggestions for future studies.

Authors:  Franziska Kühne; Jana Maas; Sophia Wiesenthal; Florian Weck
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2019-08-22

2.  Development and validation of the ExPRESS instrument for primary health care providers' evaluation of external supervision.

Authors:  Michael Schriver; Vincent Kalumire Cubaka; Peter Vedsted; Innocent Besigye; Per Kallestrup
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.640

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.