Literature DB >> 19395751

Feral swine contact with domestic swine: a serologic survey and assessment of potential for disease transmission.

A Christy Wyckoff1, Scott E Henke, Tyler A Campbell, David G Hewitt, Kurt C VerCauteren.   

Abstract

Feral swine (Sus scrofa) are present in 38 of the 50 United States, and their populations continue to expand. Domestic swine are widely regarded as vulnerable to diseases harbored by feral swine. Our objectives were to determine antibody prevalence for selected pathogens in Texas feral swine populations and identify contact events between feral and domestic swine. Overall prevalence of antibodies against brucellosis and pseudorabies virus was 11% and 30%, respectively. Antibodies to porcine reproductive and respiratory disease virus were detected in 3% of feral swine from southern Texas. All samples tested negative for antibodies to classical swine fever virus. To determine the frequency of contact events between feral swine and domestic swine in neighboring facilities, we analyzed movement data from 37 adult feral swine that were trapped < or =10 km from domestic swine facilities and equipped with geographic positioning system collars. Seven of the 37 feral swine had contact (relocated within 100 m) with domestic swine. We found that contact between feral swine and domestic swine occurred predominantly at night. Additionally, we analyzed 60 consecutive days of experimental track plots around pens that contained domestic swine and empty control pens, and found greater visitation by feral swine to the domestic swine pens. Our data demonstrate that feral swine have direct contact with domestic swine, which presents opportunity for disease transmission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19395751     DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-45.2.422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wildl Dis        ISSN: 0090-3558            Impact factor:   1.535


  29 in total

1.  Preferential sexual transmission of pseudorabies virus in feral swine populations may not account for observed seroprevalence in the USA.

Authors:  Gary Smith
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 2.670

2.  Feral Swine in the United States Have Been Exposed to both Avian and Swine Influenza A Viruses.

Authors:  Brigitte E Martin; Hailiang Sun; Margaret Carrel; Fred L Cunningham; John A Baroch; Katie C Hanson-Dorr; Sean G Young; Brandon Schmit; Jacqueline M Nolting; Kyoung-Jin Yoon; Mark W Lutman; Kerri Pedersen; Kelly Lager; Andrew S Bowman; Richard D Slemons; David R Smith; Thomas DeLiberto; Xiu-Feng Wan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Current status and future recommendations for feral swine disease surveillance in the United States.

Authors:  Vienna R Brown; Michael C Marlow; Rachel M Maison; Thomas Gidlewski; Richard Bowen; Angela Bosco-Lauth
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Locating and eliminating feral swine from a large area of fragmented mixed forest and agriculture habitats in north-central USA.

Authors:  Richard M Engeman; Bradley E Wilson; Scott F Beckerman; Justin W Fischer; Doug Dufford; James Bryan Cobban
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Dynamics of virus shedding and antibody responses in influenza A virus-infected feral swine.

Authors:  Hailiang Sun; Fred L Cunningham; Jillian Harris; Yifei Xu; Li-Ping Long; Katie Hanson-Dorr; John A Baroch; Paul Fioranelli; Mark W Lutman; Tao Li; Kerri Pedersen; Brandon S Schmit; Jim Cooley; Xiaoxu Lin; Richard G Jarman; Thomas J DeLiberto; Xiu-Feng Wan
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.891

Review 6.  Is There a Risk for Introducing Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) Through the Legal Importation of Pork?

Authors:  Megan C Niederwerder; Raymond R R Rowland
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Exposure of feral swine (Sus scrofa) in the United States to selected pathogens.

Authors:  John A Baroch; Carl A Gagnon; Sonia Lacouture; Marcelo Gottschalk
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.310

8.  Individual-Level Antibody Dynamics Reveal Potential Drivers of Influenza A Seasonality in Wild Pig Populations.

Authors:  Kim M Pepin; Kerri Pedersen; Xiu-Feng Wan; Fred L Cunningham; Colleen T Webb; Mark Q Wilber
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.326

9.  Disease risks associated with free-ranging wild boar in Saskatchewan.

Authors:  Glenna F McGregor; Marcelo Gottschalk; Dale L Godson; Wendy Wilkins; Trent K Bollinger
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.008

10.  Risk factors for contacts between wild boar and outdoor pigs in Switzerland and investigations on potential Brucella suis spill-over.

Authors:  Natacha Wu; Carlos Abril; Andreas Thomann; Eleonore Grosclaude; Marcus G Doherr; Patrick Boujon; Marie-Pierre Ryser-Degiorgis
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.