Literature DB >> 19395511

Relationship between feeding behavior and residual feed intake in growing Brangus heifers.

G M Bingham1, T H Friend, P A Lancaster, G E Carstens.   

Abstract

Residual feed intake (RFI) is a measure of feed efficiency defined as the difference between actual feed intake and expected feed intake required for maintenance and production. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between RFI, feeding behavior, and other performance traits in growing heifers. Individual DMI was measured in Brangus heifers (n = 115) fed a roughage-based diet (ME = 2.0 Mcal/kg) for 70 d using Calan-gate feeders. Residual feed intake was computed as the residuals from linear regression of DMI on mid-test BW(0.75) and ADG. Heifers with the greatest (least efficient, n = 18) and least (most efficient, n = 18) RFI were identified for quantification of feeding behavior traits. Continuous video recordings were obtained for all heifers during d 28 through d 56 of the 70-d feeding trial. Video data of 2 replications of four 24-h periods, 2 wk apart, were analyzed for the focal heifers. A head-down feeding event was defined as a heifer positioned in the feeder with her head lowered. A meal included all head-down feeding events that were separated by less than 300 s. The mean RFI for the high- and low-RFI heifers were 1.00 and -1.03 +/- 0.03 kg/d, respectively. High-RFI heifers consumed 21.9% more (P < 0.0001) DM but had similar BW and ADG compared with low-RFI heifers. The high-RFI heifers spent less time in head-down feeding events per day (P < 0.0001; 124 vs. 152 +/- 4.3 min/d), consumed DM at a faster rate (99.6 vs. 62.8 +/- 3.3 g/min), and ate more often per day (119.1 vs. 90.5 +/- 3.9 head-down feeding events/d) compared with the low-RFI heifers; however, meal duration and frequency were not related to RFI. We conclude that feeding behavior related to head-down feeding events may be more useful as an indicator of RFI than the number of meal events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19395511     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2009-1851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  7 in total

1.  Identification of Gene Networks for Residual Feed Intake in Angus Cattle Using Genomic Prediction and RNA-seq.

Authors:  Kristina L Weber; Bryan T Welly; Alison L Van Eenennaam; Amy E Young; Laercio R Porto-Neto; Antonio Reverter; Gonzalo Rincon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Only 7% of the variation in feed efficiency in veal calves can be predicted from variation in feeding motivation, digestion, metabolism, immunology, and behavioral traits in early life.

Authors:  M S Gilbert; J J G C van den Borne; C G van Reenen; W J J Gerrits
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  Selection response and genetic parameter estimation of feeding behavior traits in Pekin ducks.

Authors:  Guang-Sheng Li; Feng Zhu; Fang-Xi Yang; Jin-Ping Hao; Zhuo-Cheng Hou
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Relationships of the Microbial Communities with Rumen Epithelium Development of Nellore Cattle Finished in Feedlot Differing in Phenotypic Residual Feed Intake.

Authors:  Antonio M Silvestre; Ana Carolina J Pinto; Werner F Schleifer; Lidiane S Miranda; Leandro A F Silva; Daniel M Casali; Katia L R Souza; Vanessa G L Gasparini; Gustavo D Cruz; Garret Suen; Danilo D Millen
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Characterization of grazing behaviour microstructure using point-of-view cameras.

Authors:  Elvira Sales-Baptista; Maria Isabel Ferraz-de-Oliveira; Marina Terra-Braga; José António Lopes de Castro; João Serrano; Manuel Cancela d'Abreu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Reducing GHG emissions through genetic improvement for feed efficiency: effects on economically important traits and enteric methane production.

Authors:  J A Basarab; K A Beauchemin; V S Baron; K H Ominski; L L Guan; S P Miller; J J Crowley
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Small intestine histomorphometry of beef cattle with divergent feed efficiency.

Authors:  Yuri Montanholi; Ananda Fontoura; Kendall Swanson; Brenda Coomber; Shigeto Yamashiro; Stephen Miller
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 1.695

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.