Literature DB >> 19395391

Role of mesophyll diffusion conductance in constraining potential photosynthetic productivity in the field.

Ulo Niinemets1, Antonio Díaz-Espejo, Jaume Flexas, Jeroni Galmés, Charles R Warren.   

Abstract

Limited mesophyll diffusion conductance to CO(2) (g(m)) can significantly constrain plant photosynthesis, but the extent of g(m)-limitation is still imperfectly known. As g(m) scales positively with foliage photosynthetic capacity (A), the CO(2) drawdown from substomatal cavities (C(i)) to chloroplasts (C(C), C(i)-C(C)=A/g(m)) rather than g(m) alone characterizes the mesophyll diffusion limitations of photosynthesis. The dependencies of g(m) on A, foliage structure (leaf dry mass per unit area, M(A)), and the resulting drawdowns across a dataset of 81 species of contrasting foliage structure and photosynthetic potentials measured under non-stressed conditions were analysed to describe the structure-driven potential photosynthetic limitations due to g(m). Further the effects of key environmental stress factors and leaf and plant developmental alterations on g(m) and CO(2) drawdown were evaluated and the implications of varying g(m) on foliage photosynthesis in the field were simulated. The meta-analysis demonstrated that g(m) of non-stressed leaves was negatively correlated with M(A), and despite the positive relationship between g(m) and A, the CO(2) drawdown was larger in leaves with more robust structure. The correlations were stronger with mass-based g(m) and A, probably reflecting the circumstance that mesophyll diffusion is a complex three-dimensional process that scales better with mesophyll volume-weighted than with leaf area-weighted traits. The analysis of key environmental stress effects on g(m) and CO(2) drawdowns demonstrated that the effect of individual stresses on CO(2) drawdowns varies depending on the stress effects on foliage structure and assimilation rates. Leaf diffusion limitations are larger in non-senescent older leaves and also in senescent leaves, again reflecting more robust leaf structure and/or non-co-ordinated alterations in leaf photosynthesis and g(m). According to simulation analyses, in plants with a larger part of the overall diffusion conductance from the ambient atmosphere to the chloroplasts in the mesophyll, photosynthesis is less sensitive to changes in stomatal conductance. Accordingly, in harsher environments that support vegetation with tougher long-living stress-tolerant leaves with lower g(m), reductions in stomatal conductance that are common during stress periods are expected to alter photosynthesis less than in species where a larger part of the total diffusion limitation is determined by stomata. While structural robustness improves plant performance under environmental stress, low g(m) and inherently large CO(2) drawdown in robust leaves limits the photosynthesis of these plants more severely under favourable conditions when stomatal conductance is high. The differences in overall responsiveness to environmental modifications of plants with varying g(m) need consideration in current large-scale ecosystem productivity models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19395391     DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erp036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


  56 in total

Review 1.  Plant functional traits with particular reference to tropical deciduous forests: a review.

Authors:  R K Chaturvedi; A S Raghubanshi; J S Singh
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Leaf functional anatomy in relation to photosynthesis.

Authors:  Ichiro Terashima; Yuko T Hanba; Danny Tholen; Ülo Niinemets
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Volatile emissions from Alnus glutionosa induced by herbivory are quantitatively related to the extent of damage.

Authors:  Lucian Copolovici; Astrid Kännaste; Triinu Remmel; Vivian Vislap; Ulo Niinemets
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Impact of mesophyll diffusion on estimated global land CO2 fertilization.

Authors:  Ying Sun; Lianhong Gu; Robert E Dickinson; Richard J Norby; Stephen G Pallardy; Forrest M Hoffman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Effect of dust load on the leaf attributes of the tree species growing along the roadside.

Authors:  R K Chaturvedi; Shikha Prasad; Savita Rana; S M Obaidullah; Vijay Pandey; Hema Singh
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  The role of mesophyll conductance in the economics of nitrogen and water use in photosynthesis.

Authors:  Thomas N Buckley; Charles R Warren
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Diffusional conductances to CO2 as a target for increasing photosynthesis and photosynthetic water-use efficiency.

Authors:  Jaume Flexas; Ulo Niinemets; Alexander Gallé; Margaret M Barbour; Mauro Centritto; Antonio Diaz-Espejo; Cyril Douthe; Jeroni Galmés; Miquel Ribas-Carbo; Pedro L Rodriguez; Francesc Rosselló; Raju Soolanayakanahally; Magdalena Tomas; Ian J Wright; Graham D Farquhar; Hipólito Medrano
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  A Novel Hypothesis for the Role of Photosynthetic Physiology in Shaping Macroevolutionary Patterns.

Authors:  Charilaos Yiotis; Jennifer C McElwain
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Variable Mesophyll Conductance among Soybean Cultivars Sets a Tradeoff between Photosynthesis and Water-Use-Efficiency.

Authors:  Nicholas J Tomeo; David M Rosenthal
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Anatomical and diffusional determinants inside leaves explain the difference in photosynthetic capacity between Cypripedium and Paphiopedilum, Orchidaceae.

Authors:  Zhong-Hui Yang; Wei Huang; Qiu-Yun Yang; Wei Chang; Shi-Bao Zhang
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.