Literature DB >> 19395365

Evaluating prediction models in reproductive medicine.

S F P J Coppus1, F van der Veen, B C Opmeer, B W J Mol, P M M Bossuyt.   

Abstract

Prediction models are used in reproductive medicine to calculate the probability of pregnancy without treatment, as well as the probability of pregnancy after ovulation induction, intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilization. The performance of such prediction models is often evaluated with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The area under the ROC curve, also known as c-statistic, is then used as a measure of model performance. The value of this c-statistic is low for most prediction models in reproductive medicine. Here, we demonstrate that low values of the c-statistic are to be expected in these prediction models, but we also show that this does not imply that these models are of limited use in clinical practice. The calibration of the model (the correspondence between model-based probabilities and observed pregnancy rates) as well as the availability of a clinically useful distribution of probabilities and the ability to correctly identify the appropriate form of management are more meaningful concepts for model evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19395365     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  16 in total

1.  To what extent does Anti-Mullerian Hormone contribute to a better prediction of live birth after IVF?

Authors:  Catherine Rongieres; Carolina Colella; Philippe Lehert
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Assessing the incremental value of diagnostic and prognostic markers: a review and illustration.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Michael J Pencina; Hester F Lingsma; Michael W Kattan; Andrew J Vickers; Ben Van Calster
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 4.686

3.  Can Ratios Between Prognostic Factors Predict the Clinical Pregnancy Rate in an IVF/ICSI Program with a GnRH Agonist-FSH/hMG Protocol? An Assessment of 2421 Embryo Transfers, and a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Philippe Merviel; Michel Menard; Rosalie Cabry; Florence Scheffler; Emmanuelle Lourdel; Marie-Thérèse Le Martelot; Sylvie Roche; Jean-Jacques Chabaud; Henri Copin; Hortense Drapier; Moncef Benkhalifa; Damien Beauvillard
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 3.060

4.  Prediction of Poor Outcome After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Suzanne V Arnold; Jonathan Afilalo; John A Spertus; Yuanyuan Tang; Suzanne J Baron; Philip G Jones; Michael J Reardon; Steven J Yakubov; David H Adams; David J Cohen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Predictive models of pregnancy based on data from a preconception cohort study.

Authors:  Jennifer J Yland; Taiyao Wang; Zahra Zad; Sydney K Willis; Tanran R Wang; Amelia K Wesselink; Tammy Jiang; Elizabeth E Hatch; Lauren A Wise; Ioannis Ch Paschalidis
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Predicting Quality of Life at 1 Year After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in a Real-World Population.

Authors:  Suzanne V Arnold; David J Cohen; David Dai; Philip G Jones; Fan Li; Laine Thomas; Suzanne J Baron; Naftali Z Frankel; Susan Strong; Roland A Matsouaka; Fred H Edwards; J Matthew Brennan
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2018-10

7.  External validation of anti-Müllerian hormone based prediction of live birth in assisted conception.

Authors:  Amani Khader; Suzanne M Lloyd; Alex McConnachie; Richard Fleming; Valentina Grisendi; Antonio La Marca; Scott M Nelson
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 4.234

8.  External validation and calibration of IVFpredict: a national prospective cohort study of 130,960 in vitro fertilisation cycles.

Authors:  Andrew D A C Smith; Kate Tilling; Debbie A Lawlor; Scott M Nelson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The clinical utility curve: a proposal to improve the translation of information provided by prediction models to clinicians.

Authors:  Duncan J Campbell
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-04-14

10.  Predicting the chances of a live birth after one or more complete cycles of in vitro fertilisation: population based study of linked cycle data from 113 873 women.

Authors:  David J McLernon; Ewout W Steyerberg; Egbert R Te Velde; Amanda J Lee; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.