Literature DB >> 19395357

Development of a novel malingering detection method involving multiple detection strategies.

John J Neudecker1, Reid L Skeel.   

Abstract

This study utilized a novel computer-administered measure designed to assess multiple malingering detection strategies, as well as measure genuine impairment in a brain-injured sample. Ninety-four neurologically normal subjects comprised control and simulator groups. Twenty individuals with moderate to severe head injuries comprised a clinical sample. The summary score from the measure yielded a sensitivity of .81 and a specificity of .89. Total completion time and learning curves were utilized as genuine impairment indicators. Sensitivity (.95) and specificity (.95) were quite high for these dimensions. Results suggest there is utility to combining detection techniques, including indicators of genuine impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19395357     DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acp008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0887-6177            Impact factor:   2.813


  2 in total

1.  Malingering: an unusual cause of resistant hypertension.

Authors:  Joel Handler
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.738

2.  Detecting simulated versus bona fide traumatic brain injury using pupillometry.

Authors:  Sarah D Patrick; Lisa J Rapport; Robert J Kanser; Robin A Hanks; Jesse R Bashem
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.424

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.