Literature DB >> 19395233

Rasch analysis of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-Second Edition in intellectual disabilities.

Yee-Pay Wuang1, Yueh-Hsien Lin, Chwen-Yng Su.   

Abstract

The Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-Second Edition (BOT-2) is widely used to assess motor skills for both clinical and research purposes; however, its validity has not been adequately assessed in intellectual disabilities (ID). This study used partial credit Rasch model to examine the measurement properties of the BOT-2 among 446 children and adolescents with ID aged 4-18 years. Seventeen items were identified as problematic in the Rasch modeling. After removal of these items, the appropriateness of the response categories was examined in the 36 remaining items. Where the item response categories failed to express an increasing level of the trait (disordered thresholds), collapsing adjacent categories was performed to address this issue. After rescoring most items, items in each composite of the revised BOT-2 showed good fit to the Rasch model and demonstrated excellent reliability (range 0.90-0.97). No differential item functioning was detected with respect to age and gender. The ability of the revised composites to differentiate between mild versus moderate to severe ID was better than those of the original BOT-2. Items from the manual coordination and strength and agility composites were well targeted to the sample, whereas items from fine manual control and body coordination composites were mostly targeted at the lower levels of ability in these domains. Items of higher difficulty may be supplemented to increase the range of ability levels of the people to whom these two composites can be applied with precision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19395233     DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Dev Disabil        ISSN: 0891-4222


  8 in total

1.  Motor proficiency in children with neurofibromatosis type 1.

Authors:  Barbara A Johnson; Bruce A MacWilliams; John C Carey; David H Viskochil; Jacques L D'Astous; David A Stevenson
Journal:  Pediatr Phys Ther       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.049

2.  Test of Motor Proficiency Second Edition (BOT-2): Compatibility of the Complete and Short Form and Its Usefulness for Middle-Age School Children.

Authors:  Jan Jírovec; Martin Musálek; Filip Mess
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 3.418

3.  Sensory Integration and Functional Reaching in Children With Rett Syndrome/Rett-Related Disorders.

Authors:  Wendy Drobnyk; Karen Rocco; Sara Davidson; Susan Bruce; Fang Zhang; Stephen B Soumerai
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Pediatr       Date:  2019-08-26

4.  Motor competence assessments for children with intellectual disabilities and/or autism: a systematic review.

Authors:  Samantha J Downs; Lynne M Boddy; Bronagh McGrane; James R Rudd; Craig A Melville; Lawrence Foweather
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2020-11-19

5.  Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2: The Use of Rasch Analysis to Examine the Model Unidimensionality, Motor Function, and Item Difficulty.

Authors:  Nadia Cristina Valentini; Larissa Wagner Zanella
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.569

6.  The Assessment of the Psychomotor Profile in Children: Preliminary Psychometric Analysis of the Portuguese Version of the Batterie d'Evaluation des Fonctions Neuropsychomotrices de L'enfant (NPmot.pt).

Authors:  Nídia De Amorim; José Parreiral; Sofia Santos
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-09

7.  Gait and Lower Limb Observation of Paediatrics (GALLOP): development of a consensus based paediatric podiatry and physiotherapy standardised recording proforma.

Authors:  Simone Cranage; Helen Banwell; Cylie M Williams
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Psychometric properties of gross motor assessment tools for children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alison Griffiths; Rachel Toovey; Prue E Morgan; Alicia J Spittle
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.