Literature DB >> 19395154

Long-term efficacy of maintenance bacillus Calmette-Guérin versus maintenance mitomycin C instillation therapy in frequently recurrent TaT1 tumours without carcinoma in situ: a subgroup analysis of the prospective, randomised FinnBladder I study with a 20-year follow-up.

Riikka Järvinen1, Eero Kaasinen, Anna Sankila, Erkki Rintala.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The long-term prospective data on bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) and mitomycin C (MMC) instillation therapy are limited.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term benefit of BCG and MMC maintenance therapy in patients with recurrent bladder carcinoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-nine patients with frequently recurrent TaT1 disease without carcinoma in situ (CIS) were eligible. Originally, the patients were enrolled in the prospective FinnBladder I study between 1984 and 1987 and randomised to receive BCG or MMC. Both regimens involved five weekly instillations, followed by monthly instillations for 2 yr. Because of alkalinising the urine and adjusting the dose to bladder capacity, the average concentration of MMC was low: 30-40 mg in 150-200 ml of phosphate buffer. Overall median follow-up time was 8.5 yr, whereas the median follow-up time of the patients who were still alive was 19.4 yr. MEASUREMENTS: Primary end points were time to first recurrence and overall mortality. Secondary end points were progression and disease-specific mortality. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Thirty-six of 45 patients (80.0%) in the MMC group experienced recurrence in contrast to 26 of 44 patients (59.1%) in the BCG group. This finding was reflected in significantly lower cumulative incidence estimates in the BCG group (p=0.005). There was a weak trend for fewer progressions (p=0.1) and cancer-specific deaths (p=0.2) in the cumulative incidence analysis, as 4 patients versus 10 patients progressed and 4 patients versus 9 patients died from the disease in the BCG group versus the MMC group, respectively. No difference existed in the overall mortality. The study population, however, was too small for conclusive evidence about progression or survival.
CONCLUSIONS: An intensive intravesical BCG immunotherapy results in a sustained and significant long-term reduction in recurrence in frequently recurrent bladder carcinoma. The relatively low progression rate during the long follow-up suggests that it may be difficult to show significant differences in overall mortality with a substantially larger but otherwise similar study population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration was not considered to be necessary at this stage of the follow-up because the study was initiated as early as 1984 and the last randomisation took place in July 1987, that is, long before the current requirements concerning study registrations were implemented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19395154     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  29 in total

Review 1.  Long-term outcomes of intravesical therapy for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Alon Z Weizer; Christopher Tallman; Jeffrey S Montgomery
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-11-28       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Defining and treating the spectrum of intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ashish M Kamat; J Alfred Witjes; Maurizio Brausi; Mark Soloway; Donald Lamm; Raj Persad; Roger Buckley; Andreas Böhle; Marc Colombel; Joan Palou
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Bladder cancer: meta-analysis of BCG versus mitomycin C--a deeper insight?

Authors:  Andreas Böhle
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin versus mitomycin C for Ta and T1 bladder cancer: Abridged summary of the Cochrane Review.

Authors:  Stefanie Schmidt; Frank Kunath; Bernadette Coles; Desiree Louise Draeger; Laura-Maria Krabbe; Rick Dersch; Samuel Kilian; Katrin Jensen; Philipp Dahm; Joerg J Meerpohl
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2020-06-29

Review 5.  The expanding repertoire of targets for immune checkpoint inhibition in bladder cancer: What lies beneath the tip of the iceberg, PD-L1.

Authors:  Alexander Sankin; Deepa Narasimhulu; Peter John; Benjamin Gartrell; Mark Schoenberg; Xingxing Zang
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 3.498

6.  Best practice in the treatment of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Anastasios Anastasiadis; Theo M de Reijke
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2012-02

Review 7.  Optimal treatment of non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma including perioperative management revisited.

Authors:  Matthew J Pagano; Gina Badalato; James M McKiernan
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 8.  Guideline of guidelines: non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Solomon L Woldu; Aditya Bagrodia; Yair Lotan
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Can intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin reduce recurrence in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer? An update and cumulative meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiangang Pan; Mo Liu; Xing Zhou
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 10.  Applications of bacillus Calmette-Guerin and recombinant bacillus Calmette-Guerin in vaccine development and tumor immunotherapy.

Authors:  Yuan-qiang Zheng; Youssef W Naguib; Yixuan Dong; Yan-chun Shi; Shorgan Bou; Zhengrong Cui
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.