Literature DB >> 19394959

Dose-dependent frontal hypometabolism on FDG-PET in methamphetamine abusers.

Yang-Tae Kim1, Sang-Woo Lee, Do-Hoon Kwon, Ji-Hyoung Seo, Byeong-Cheol Ahn, Jaetae Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although a lot of evidence from neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies supports the view that patients with substance dependence have abnormalities in the prefrontal cortex, functional deficits in the prefrontal cortex have not been fully investigated in methamphetamine (MA) dependent patients. This study was prepared to examine whether MA abusers have cerebral metabolic abnormalities and executive dysfunction.
METHOD: Twenty-four abstinent MA dependent patients and 21 age-matched control subjects underwent resting brain FDG-PET and completed computerized versions of the Wisconsin card sorting test (WCST). Resting brain PET images were obtained 30min after an intravenous injection of 370MBq of (18)F-FDG. Significant differences in glucose metabolism were estimated for every voxel using t-statistics on SPM2 implemented in Matlab.
RESULTS: Resting brain FDG-PET revealed significant hypometabolism in the left inferior frontal white matter (Talairach coordinates (x, y, z): -34, 7, 31) in MA dependent patients compared to the control subjects (corrected p=0.001, peak Z=5.37, voxel number 201). The nearest gray matter region was the left inferior frontal cortex (Brodmann area 9). There were negative correlations between the relative regional cerebral metabolism for glucose (rCMRglc) in the left inferior frontal white matter and the total cumulative dose of MA (r=-0.57, p<0.01). MA dependent patients completed significantly fewer categories (3.8+/-2.2) and made more perseveration errors (21.3+/-11.8) and total errors (43.5+/-19.5) on the WCST when compared to the control subjects (p<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that MA dependent patients have dose-dependent frontal hypometabolism and frontal executive dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19394959     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 0022-3956            Impact factor:   4.791


  20 in total

1.  Bayesian neural adjustment of inhibitory control predicts emergence of problem stimulant use.

Authors:  Katia M Harlé; Jennifer L Stewart; Shunan Zhang; Susan F Tapert; Angela J Yu; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 2.  Altered energy production, lowered antioxidant potential, and inflammatory processes mediate CNS damage associated with abuse of the psychostimulants MDMA and methamphetamine.

Authors:  Luke A Downey; Jennifer M Loftis
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 4.432

Review 3.  Methamphetamine influences on brain and behavior: unsafe at any speed?

Authors:  John F Marshall; Steven J O'Dell
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 13.837

4.  Altered neural processing of the need to stop in young adults at risk for stimulant dependence.

Authors:  Katia M Harlé; Pradeep Shenoy; Jennifer L Stewart; Susan F Tapert; Angela J Yu; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Is cognitive functioning impaired in methamphetamine users? A critical review.

Authors:  Carl L Hart; Caroline B Marvin; Rae Silver; Edward E Smith
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 6.  Neuropathology of substance use disorders.

Authors:  Jean Lud Cadet; Veronica Bisagno; Christopher Mark Milroy
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 17.088

7.  Perseverative behavior in rats with methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Jong-Hyun Son; James Kuhn; Kristen A Keefe
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 5.250

8.  Striatal dopamine d2/d3 receptor availability is reduced in methamphetamine dependence and is linked to impulsivity.

Authors:  Buyean Lee; Edythe D London; Russell A Poldrack; Judah Farahi; Angelo Nacca; John R Monterosso; Jeanette A Mumford; Andrew V Bokarius; Magnus Dahlbom; Jogeshwar Mukherjee; Robert M Bilder; Arthur L Brody; Mark A Mandelkern
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Psychostimulants and cognition: a continuum of behavioral and cognitive activation.

Authors:  Suzanne Wood; Jennifer R Sage; Tristan Shuman; Stephan G Anagnostaras
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 25.468

10.  Methamphetamine preconditioning alters midbrain transcriptional responses to methamphetamine-induced injury in the rat striatum.

Authors:  Jean Lud Cadet; Michael T McCoy; Ning Sheng Cai; Irina N Krasnova; Bruce Ladenheim; Genevieve Beauvais; Natascha Wilson; William Wood; Kevin G Becker; Amber B Hodges
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.