RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To compare B-mode ultrasonography (US) alone with the combination of B-mode and contrast-enhanced (Sonazoid) late-phase pulse-inversion US for the detection of hepatic metastases by use of jackknife free-response receiver-operating characteristic (JAFROC) analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with 57 hepatic metastases and 6 patients without hepatic metastases underwent B-mode and contrast-enhanced US. We used the diagnoses established by contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced US as the standard of reference. All ultrasonographic scanning was performed by an experienced radiologist with a routine clinical procedure. All scanning data were archived with digital cine clips. A review system, which can display pairs of cine clips for B-mode and contrast-enhanced US side by side, was developed for off-site observer study. Seven radiologists interpreted each case individually first by B-mode US only, and then by the combination with contrast-enhanced US by identifying locations of possible candidates for hepatic metastasis with their confidence ratings. The figure-of-merit (FOM) values, sensitivity, and false-positives per case were estimated for B-mode US alone, and for the combination of B-mode and contrast-enhanced US. RESULTS: The sensitivities of the combined ultrasonographic imaging (mean, 72.2%) were clearly improved from that of B-mode US alone (mean, 41.6%) while reducing the average number of false positives from 1.1 to 0.5 per case. In the jackknife analysis, there was a statistically significant difference between mean FOM values for the combined imaging (0.76) and for B-mode US alone (0.44, P < .00001). CONCLUSION: Evaluating cine clips of contrast-enhanced liver US together with B-mode US could improve physicians' accuracy for detection of hepatic metastases.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To compare B-mode ultrasonography (US) alone with the combination of B-mode and contrast-enhanced (Sonazoid) late-phase pulse-inversion US for the detection of hepatic metastases by use of jackknife free-response receiver-operating characteristic (JAFROC) analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with 57 hepatic metastases and 6 patients without hepatic metastases underwent B-mode and contrast-enhanced US. We used the diagnoses established by contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced US as the standard of reference. All ultrasonographic scanning was performed by an experienced radiologist with a routine clinical procedure. All scanning data were archived with digital cine clips. A review system, which can display pairs of cine clips for B-mode and contrast-enhanced US side by side, was developed for off-site observer study. Seven radiologists interpreted each case individually first by B-mode US only, and then by the combination with contrast-enhanced US by identifying locations of possible candidates for hepatic metastasis with their confidence ratings. The figure-of-merit (FOM) values, sensitivity, and false-positives per case were estimated for B-mode US alone, and for the combination of B-mode and contrast-enhanced US. RESULTS: The sensitivities of the combined ultrasonographic imaging (mean, 72.2%) were clearly improved from that of B-mode US alone (mean, 41.6%) while reducing the average number of false positives from 1.1 to 0.5 per case. In the jackknife analysis, there was a statistically significant difference between mean FOM values for the combined imaging (0.76) and for B-mode US alone (0.44, P < .00001). CONCLUSION: Evaluating cine clips of contrast-enhanced liver US together with B-mode US could improve physicians' accuracy for detection of hepatic metastases.
Authors: Jean-Michel Correas; Gavin Low; Laurence Needleman; Michelle L Robbin; David Cosgrove; Paul S Sidhu; Chris J Harvey; Thomas Albrecht; Jarl A Jakobsen; Knut Brabrand; Manfred Jenett; Jane Bates; Michel Claudon; Edward Leen Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-04-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Qiong Wu; Yilun Liu; Di Sun; Yan Wang; Xiaoer Wei; Jing Li; Beibei Liu; Shuhao Wang; Yan Zhou; Haiyan Hu; Rui Zhang; Qiong Jiao; Yi Li; Tao Ying Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2022-08-09