Literature DB >> 19394702

In vivo confocal microscopic findings of corneal wound healing after corneal epithelial debridement in diabetic vitrectomy.

Wei-Li Chen1, Chung-Tien Lin, Pei-Shou Ko, Po-Ting Yeh, Yi-Hsuan Kuan, Fung-Rong Hu, Chung-May Yang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study healing of corneal wounds using in vivo confocal microscopy in patients who received corneal epithelial debridement during pars plana vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy and to investigate risk factors for delayed healing.
DESIGN: Prospective, observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-four eyes of 40 patients were enrolled.
METHODS: In vivo confocal microscopy was used to evaluate selected images of the corneal basal and apical surface epithelial cells and subbasal nerves before surgery, weekly for the first month, and at 3 and 6 months after surgery. Slit-lamp biomicroscopy was carried out at the same time. Multiple linear regression analysis of selected potential risk factors was performed to investigate the main determinants of delayed corneal healing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Healing rate of corneal epithelial cells and subbasal nerves and factors influencing the healing.
RESULTS: By slit-lamp biomicroscopy, corneal epithelial defects were found in 22.8% of eyes at 2 weeks and in 5.4% at 1 month after surgery. In vivo confocal microscopy demonstrated incomplete healing of basal epithelial cells in 72.1%, 15.2%, and 0% of eyes and incomplete healing of surface apical epithelial cells in 81.1%, 9.1%, and 0% of eyes at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. The percentage of subbasal nerves regaining preoperative appearance was 0%, 6.8%, and 89.3% at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Regression analysis revealed infusion of silicone oil (P = 0.020) and C(3)F(8) (P = 0.017) resulted in delayed healing by slit-lamp biomicroscopy; age (P = 0.028), diabetic treatment regimen (P = 0.014), and scleral buckling (P = 0.001) correlated with delayed recovery of basal cells by in vivo confocal microscopy. The latter 2 factors also were related to delayed reconformation of apical cells (P = 0.011 and 0.004, respectively). Neither healing of apical and basal cells showed a significant correlation to findings by slit-lamp biomicroscopy (r = 0.19 and 0.09).
CONCLUSIONS: Healing of corneal epithelial wounds in diabetic eyes is slow. Both the basal and apical epithelial layers were involved in the slow healing process. Age, diabetic treatment regimen, and several intraoperative factors may alter healing rates. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19394702     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  26 in total

1.  In vivo confocal microscopy of early corneal epithelial recovery in patients with chemical injury.

Authors:  J Xiang; Q Le; Y Li; J Xu
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  Diabetic complications in the cornea.

Authors:  Alexander V Ljubimov
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 3.  Novel Therapy to Treat Corneal Epithelial Defects: A Hypothesis with Growth Hormone.

Authors:  Barbara Wirostko; MaryJane Rafii; David A Sullivan; Julia Morelli; Juan Ding
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  Enhanced wound healing, kinase and stem cell marker expression in diabetic organ-cultured human corneas upon MMP-10 and cathepsin F gene silencing.

Authors:  Mehrnoosh Saghizadeh; Irina Epifantseva; David M Hemmati; Chantelle A Ghiam; William J Brunken; Alexander V Ljubimov
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Normalization of wound healing and stem cell marker patterns in organ-cultured human diabetic corneas by gene therapy of limbal cells.

Authors:  Mehrnoosh Saghizadeh; Christian M Dib; William J Brunken; Alexander V Ljubimov
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 6.  Diabetic keratopathy: Insights and challenges.

Authors:  S Priyadarsini; A Whelchel; S Nicholas; R Sharif; K Riaz; D Karamichos
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 6.048

7.  Normalization of wound healing and diabetic markers in organ cultured human diabetic corneas by adenoviral delivery of c-Met gene.

Authors:  Mehrnoosh Saghizadeh; Andrei A Kramerov; Fu-Shin X Yu; Maria G Castro; Alexander V Ljubimov
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Adenovirus-driven overexpression of proteinases in organ-cultured normal human corneas leads to diabetic-like changes.

Authors:  Mehrnoosh Saghizadeh; Andrei A Kramerov; Yousha Yaghoobzadeh; Jinwei Hu; Julia Y Ljubimova; Keith L Black; Maria G Castro; Alexander V Ljubimov
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 9.  Corneal confocal microscopy: a new technique for early detection of diabetic neuropathy.

Authors:  N Papanas; D Ziegler
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 10.  Stem cell therapies in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy and keratopathy.

Authors:  Andrei A Kramerov; Alexander V Ljubimov
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2015-10-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.