Literature DB >> 19394553

Compression therapy in breast cancer-related lymphedema: A randomized, controlled comparative study of relation between volume and interface pressure changes.

Robert J Damstra1, Hugo Partsch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Short stretch bandages are very effective in the initial management of arm lymphedema. However, no studies to date have measured the pressure required to achieve specific amounts of volume reduction. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a difference between low and high-pressure bandaging in terms of therapeutically intended volume reduction of the compressed arm.
METHODS: Experimental, randomized and comparative study with two study-groups consisting of high and low initial interface pressure bandages. Thirty-six hospitalized patients in Nij Smellinghe hospital suffering from moderate to severe unilateral breast cancer-related lymphedema not responsive to outpatient treatment were included. Bilateral arm volume was measured by inverse water volumetry before, after two hours and after 24 hours of bandaging. The amount of edema was calculated by subtracting the volume of the diseased arm from that of the contralateral side. Sub-bandage pressure was measured after bandage application and two hours later. Bandages were then re-applied and the pressure was measured again. Twenty-four hours later, the pressure measurement was repeated and bandages were removed for final volumetry. Patients were randomized into two groups: group A received low pressure bandages (20-30 mm Hg) and group B received high pressure bandages (44-58 mm Hg). The main outcome measures were reduction of arm volume and edema volume in the affected arm in both study groups. Secondary outcome parameters were changes in sub-bandage pressure and patient comfort.
RESULTS: Median arm volume reduction after two and 24 hours was 104.5 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 51.2-184.2) (-2.5%) (P < .0001) and 217 mL (95% CI, 143.9-280.2) (-5.2%) (P < .01) for group A and 56.5 mL (95% CI, -2.7-123.1) (n.s.) and 167.5 mL (95% CI, 105.2-316.1) (-4.2%) (P < .01) for group B, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the volume changes in group A and group B. After 24 hours, edema decreased by median percentage of 9.2% in group A and 4.8% in group B (n.s.). Bandages in group A were better tolerated. The sub-bandage pressure drop in the first two hours was between 41% and 48% in both treatment groups at both measuring sites. After 24 hours, the pressure drop was between 55% and 63%. No proximal swelling above the bandage was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Inelastic, multi-layer, multi-component compression bandages with lower pressure (20-30 mm Hg) are better tolerated and achieve the same amount of arm volume reduction as bandages applied with higher pressure (44-58 mm Hg) in the first 24 hours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19394553     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  12 in total

Review 1.  Dogmas and controversies in compression therapy: report of an International Compression Club (ICC) meeting, Brussels, May 2011.

Authors:  Mieke Flour; Michael Clark; Hugo Partsch; Giovanni Mosti; Jean-Francois Uhl; Michel Chauveau; Francois Cros; Pierre Gelade; Dean Bender; Anneke Andriessen; Jan Schuren; André Cornu-Thenard; Ed Arkans; Dragan Milic; Jean-Patrick Benigni; Robert Damstra; Gyozo Szolnoky; Franz Schingale
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Compression garments versus compression bandaging in decongestive lymphatic therapy for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Myrna King; Audrey Deveaux; Heather White; Daniel Rayson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Change in extracellular fluid and arm volumes as a consequence of a single session of lymphatic massage followed by rest with or without compression.

Authors:  J Maher; K Refshauge; L Ward; R Paterson; S Kilbreath
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  A novel air microfluidics-enabled soft robotic sleeve: Toward realizing innovative lymphedema treatment.

Authors:  Run Ze Gao; Vivian Ngoc Tram Mai; Nicholas Levinski; Jacqueline Mary Kormylo; Robin Ward Murdock; Clark R Dickerson; Carolyn L Ren
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 3.258

Review 5.  [New aspects of compression therapy].

Authors:  Bernhard Partsch; Hugo Partsch
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2016-06-03

6.  Synergic effect of compression therapy and controlled active exercises using a facilitating device in the treatment of arm lymphedema.

Authors:  Maria de Fátima Guerreiro Godoy; Maria Regina Pereira; Antonio Helio Oliani; Jose Maria Pereira de Godoy
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 7.  Systematic review: conservative treatments for secondary lymphedema.

Authors:  Mark Oremus; Ian Dayes; Kathryn Walker; Parminder Raina
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 8.  Optimizing post-acute care in breast cancer survivors: a rehabilitation perspective.

Authors:  Bhasker Amatya; Fary Khan; Mary P Galea
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2017-08-30

9.  Interest of an auto-adjustable nighttime compression sleeve (MOBIDERM® Autofit) in maintenance phase of upper limb lymphedema: the MARILYN pilot RCT.

Authors:  S Mestre; C Calais; G Gaillard; M Nou; M Pasqualini; C Ben Amor; I Quere
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Twisting Tourniquet(©) Technique: introducing Schnogh, a novel device and its effectiveness in treating primary and secondary lymphedema of extremities.

Authors:  Narumon Chanwimalueang; Wichai Ekataksin; Parkpoom Piyaman; Gedsuda Pattanapen; Borimas K Hanboon
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.