A comparison of two systems for entering and assessing dietary data for a research study.

To reduce the cost of analyzing dietary data for research studies, we evaluated the accuracy of an entry and assessment system that could be used by trained food and nutrition professionals who did not routinely perform this type of task. We compared intakes from 24-hour recalls for 175 adult women and 185 schoolchildren using two methods for entry of dietary data. For the standard method, registered dietitians who routinely evaluate dietary data entered the recalls using a professional data entry program, RapidCalc. For the second method, other food and nutrition professionals were trained by the registered dietitians to use the Pacific Tracker program, a consumer-friendly dietary assessment system. Both programs use the same food composition table. Mean food group and nutrient intakes were similar for the two methods, differing by <10% on average for both adults and children. Correlations were also high, ranging from 0.77 to 0.96 for the women and from 0.76 to 0.94 for the children. For adults and children combined, mean energy intakes were remarkably close, at 2,067 kcal/d for RapidCalc and 2,072 kcal/d for Pacific Tracker, although absolute differences in energy intakes were >300 kcal/d for 23% of the women and 30% of the children. Costs are much lower with the Pacific Tracker method, unless the fees for the standard method are subsidized. We conclude that the Pacific Tracker method provides an accurate and cost-effective method of dietary data entry for research purposes.