Literature DB >> 19394352

Meal patterns of mice under systematically varying approach and unit costs for food in a closed economy.

Deniz Atalayer1, Neil E Rowland.   

Abstract

Several field and experimental studies have investigated the behavioral economics of food intake. In the laboratory, operant behavior has been used to emulate cost and to generate demand functions that express the relationship between the price of food and amount consumed. There have been few such studies of motivated food seeking and intake in mice, and none has reported demand functions. Using albino (CD1) male mice, the present study compares food intake and meal patterns across a series of ratio cost schedules. The first experiment examined unit price. A closed economy was used in which the mice were in the test chambers for 23 h/day and earned all of their food via either a nose poke or lever press response under fixed (FUP5, FUP10, FUP25, FUP50), variable (VUP10, VUP20, VUP50), and progressive (PUP1.25, PUP1.5, PUP1.75) unit prices. Mice were run for 4 days at each cost. There were no consistent differences between the first and last day indicating that behavioral adjustments to schedule changes occurred rapidly. When averaged across all price schedules, mice in the nose poke group consumed more food than their lever press counterparts but the overall shapes of the demand curves did not differ between the two operant responses, with intake decreasing as price increased. The number of meals taken per day differed between two meal-defining criteria that we applied, and there were some differences between the types of unit price schedule. In the second experiment, approach cost in the form of nose poke responses was required to activate a response device (lever) on which a fixed unit price for food was in force. These approach and unit costs were varied systematically. Meal number decreased, and meal size increased, with increasing approach cost even though nose pokes accounted for only a small fraction of the total response activity. Thus, meal patterns in mice are sensitive to approach cost while total amount consumed is more sensitive to unit price. These data are discussed in terms of the concept of foraging cost as either a unitary or a multidimensional variable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19394352      PMCID: PMC2722741          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  29 in total

1.  Intravenous self-administration of heroin/cocaine combinations (speedball) using nose-poke or lever-press operant responding in mice.

Authors:  V David; I Polis; J McDonald; L H Gold
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.293

Review 2.  Meal patterning in rodents: psychopharmacological and neuroanatomical studies.

Authors:  P G Clifton
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 3.  The controls of eating: a shift from nutritional homeostasis to behavioral neuroscience.

Authors:  G P Smith
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.008

4.  Behavioral economics.

Authors:  S R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Free feeding in normal and "recovered lateral" rats monitored by a pellet-detecting eatometer.

Authors:  H R Kissileff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1970-02

6.  Correlated changes in feeding behavior on selection for large and small body size in mice.

Authors:  S Petersen; J C McCarthy
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  Behavioral, physiological, and molecular differences in response to dietary restriction in three inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Cigdem Gelegen; David A Collier; Iain C Campbell; Hugo Oppelaar; Martien J H Kas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 4.310

8.  Meal patterns and foraging in melanocortin receptor knockout mice.

Authors:  C H Vaughan; Marcus C Moore; C Haskell-Luevano; N E Rowland
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2004-11-21

9.  CCK(1) receptor is essential for normal meal patterning in mice fed high fat diet.

Authors:  Michael J Donovan; Gabriel Paulino; Helen E Raybould
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-12-05

10.  c-Kit mutant mouse behavioral phenotype: altered meal patterns and CCK sensitivity but normal daily food intake and body weight.

Authors:  Michael M Chi; Terry L Powley
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 3.619

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Order and disorder: temporal organization of eating.

Authors:  Neil E Rowland
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Effects of meal frequency and snacking on food demand in mice.

Authors:  Deniz Atalayer; Neil E Rowland
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  Food demand and meal size in mice with single or combined disruption of melanocortin type 3 and 4 receptors.

Authors:  Deniz Atalayer; Kimberly L Robertson; Carrie Haskell-Luevano; Amy Andreasen; Neil E Rowland
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Structure of motivation using food demand in mice.

Authors:  Deniz Atalayer; Neil E Rowland
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-05-01

5.  Comparison of voluntary and foraging running wheel activity on food demand in mice.

Authors:  Deniz Atalayer; Neil E Rowland
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-10-14

6.  Comparison of C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice in food motivation and satiety.

Authors:  Deniz Atalayer; Neil E Rowland
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-02-06

7.  Dissociating the effects of dopamine D2 receptors on effort-based versus value-based decision making using a novel behavioral approach.

Authors:  Matthew R Bailey; Eileen Chun; Elke Schipani; Peter D Balsam; Eleanor H Simpson
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 8.  Neural substrates underlying effort, time, and risk-based decision making in motivated behavior.

Authors:  Matthew R Bailey; Eleanor H Simpson; Peter D Balsam
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  Conjectures on some curious connections among social status, calorie restriction, hunger, fatness, and longevity.

Authors:  Kathryn A Kaiser; Daniel L Smith; David B Allison
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Nucleus accumbens shell moderates preference bias during voluntary choice behavior.

Authors:  Hyeran Jang; Kanghoon Jung; Jaehoon Jeong; Sang Ki Park; Jerald D Kralik; Jaeseung Jeong
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.