OBJECTIVES: To determine if serum natriuretic peptide (NP) concentrations could distinguish cardiac from non-cardiac causes of respiratory distress (RD) in cats. ANIMALS: Seventy-four cats from 1 university hospital were used. METHODS: Serum NP concentrations were measured in 41 cats with non-cardiac respiratory distress (RD-NC) and compared to 33 cats with RD due to congestive heart failure (RD+CHF) using sandwich enzyme immunoassays (ELISA). RESULTS: RD-NC cats had lower (P=0.0001) median NT-proANP and NT-proBNP concentrations (614 and 45 fmol/mL, respectively) than RD+CHF cats (1690 and 523 fmol/mL, respectively). The area under the curve was 0.88 and 0.96 for the receiver operating curve analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of NT-proANP and NT-proBNP concentrations to discriminate RD+CHF from RD-NC cats (P=0.036). An optimum cut-off concentration of 986 fmol/mL for NT-proANP and 220 fmol/mL for NT-proBNP accurately discriminated RD-NC from RC+CHF cats with a sensitivity of 93.8% and 93.9% and a specificity of 80.3% and 87.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Serum NP concentrations were different in RD+CHF cats compared to RD-NC cats. Evaluation of circulating NP concentrations may be helpful in the initial approach to cats presenting with respiratory distress, particularly if advances in ELISA technology result in a rapid cage-side test.
OBJECTIVES: To determine if serum natriuretic peptide (NP) concentrations could distinguish cardiac from non-cardiac causes of respiratory distress (RD) in cats. ANIMALS: Seventy-four cats from 1 university hospital were used. METHODS: Serum NP concentrations were measured in 41 cats with non-cardiac respiratory distress (RD-NC) and compared to 33 cats with RD due to congestive heart failure (RD+CHF) using sandwich enzyme immunoassays (ELISA). RESULTS: RD-NC cats had lower (P=0.0001) median NT-proANP and NT-proBNP concentrations (614 and 45 fmol/mL, respectively) than RD+CHFcats (1690 and 523 fmol/mL, respectively). The area under the curve was 0.88 and 0.96 for the receiver operating curve analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of NT-proANP and NT-proBNP concentrations to discriminate RD+CHF from RD-NC cats (P=0.036). An optimum cut-off concentration of 986 fmol/mL for NT-proANP and 220 fmol/mL for NT-proBNP accurately discriminated RD-NC from RC+CHFcats with a sensitivity of 93.8% and 93.9% and a specificity of 80.3% and 87.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Serum NP concentrations were different in RD+CHFcats compared to RD-NC cats. Evaluation of circulating NP concentrations may be helpful in the initial approach to cats presenting with respiratory distress, particularly if advances in ELISA technology result in a rapid cage-side test.
Authors: A N Harris; S S Beatty; A H Estrada; B Winter; M Bohannon; I Sosa; J Hanscom; C A Mainville; A E Gallagher Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Jessica L Ward; Gregory R Lisciandro; Wendy A Ware; Austin K Viall; Brent D Aona; Kari A Kurtz; Yamir Reina-Doreste; Teresa C DeFrancesco Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2018-09-14 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Joonbum Seo; Jessie Rosie Payne; Jose Novo Matos; Wesley Wynne Fong; David J Connolly; Virginia Luis Fuentes Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2020-08-21 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: M J Hezzell; J E Rush; K Humm; E A Rozanski; J Sargent; D J Connolly; A Boswood; M A Oyama Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2016-01-27 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Virginia Luis Fuentes; Jonathan Abbott; Valérie Chetboul; Etienne Côté; Philip R Fox; Jens Häggström; Mark D Kittleson; Karsten Schober; Joshua A Stern Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2020-04-03 Impact factor: 3.333