Literature DB >> 19394006

EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors.

Katherine M Hoda1, Sarah A Rodriguez, Douglas O Faigel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic yield of EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) of suspected GI stromal tumors (GIST) has not been assessed in large series.
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA of subepithelial lesions with EUS features suggestive of GIST.
DESIGN: Retrospective database review.
SETTING: Tertiary care referral center and an urban Veterans Administration hospital. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients referred for EUS evaluation of upper GI subepithelial lesions of the fourth endosonographic layer who underwent EUS-FNA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Proportion of patients whose cytopathologic examination was diagnostic (immunohistochemical stains establish a specific diagnosis), suspicious (spindle cells identified, quantity not sufficient for specific stains), or nondiagnostic.
RESULTS: A total of 112 patients (45.5% female, mean age 61.6 years) underwent EUS-FNA (mean number of FNA passes 5.3). Tumor location was as follows: stomach 62.5%, esophagus 30.4%, and duodenum 7.1%. EUS-FNA was diagnostic in 61.6%, suspicious (spindle cells) in 22.3%, and nondiagnostic in 16.1%. The histologic results were 31.3% GIST, 26.8% leiomyomas, 22.3% spindle cell neoplasms, 3.5 % neural tumors, and 16.1% nondiagnostic. Fifteen (12.5%) patients also underwent EUS-guided core needle biopsy needle sampling; 7 were diagnostic, 2 suspicious, and 6 nondiagnostic. Twenty-four (20.0%) patients underwent jumbo forceps sampling; 5 were diagnostic, 1 suspicious, and 18 nondiagnostic. There were no cases of diagnostic core needle biopsy after nondiagnostic FNA core needle biopsy. Jumbo forceps biopsy of ulcerated masses was diagnostic in 3 GISTs in which FNA was nondiagnostic. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that no variable was associated with an increased diagnostic yield.
CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA sampling of subepithelial lesions was diagnostic in 61.6% and showed a spindle cell neoplasm ("suspicious") in another 22.3% (diagnostic yield 83.9%). Core needle biopsy needle sampling did not increase the yield, but in the setting of an ulcerated mass, forceps biopsy may be diagnostic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19394006     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  87 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Vinay Chandrasekhara; Gregory G Ginsberg
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2011-12

2.  Diagnostic efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle sampling for upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Cen Zhang; Quan-Lin Li; Yong-Fu Yu; Li-Qing Yao; Mei-Dong Xu; Yi-Qun Zhang; Yun-Shi Zhong; Wei-Feng Chen; Ping-Hong Zhou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Diagnosis value of CD117 and PDGFRA, alone or in combination DOG1, as biomarkers for gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Chunwei Xu; Hongyan Han; Jingjing Wang; Bo Zhang; Yun Shao; Liying Zhang; Huaitao Wang; Haiyan Wang; Yongfang Wu; Xiaobing Li; Ruiming Li; Yuwang Tian
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-11

4.  Gastric malignant schwannoma presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a case report.

Authors:  Masashi Takemura; Kayo Yoshida; Mamiko Takii; Katsunobu Sakurai; Akishige Kanazawa
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2012-01-25

5.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided Trucut biopsy of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumor.

Authors:  John DeWitt; Robert E Emerson; Stuart Sherman; Mohammad Al-Haddad; Lee McHenry; Gregory A Cote; Julia K Leblanc
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided single-incision needle knife biopsy for gastric subepithelial tumors: comparison with resected specimens.

Authors:  Joon Sung Kim; Byung-Wook Kim; Gi Jun Kim; Young Wook Kim; Seung Ji Ryu; Sung Min Park; Jeong-Seon Ji; Sun Young Jun
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  EUS-guided fine needle aspiration of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: the GIST of the matter.

Authors:  Vinay Chandrasekhara; Nuzhat A Ahmad
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 8.  [When only the pathologist may help. Limitation and possibilities of biopsies in Internal Medicine].

Authors:  R Knüchel-Clarke; H H Lutz; J Floege; N Marx; T H Brümmendorf; C Trautwein
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.743

9.  Yields and Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided 19-Gauge Trucut Biopsy versus 22-Gauge Fine Needle Aspiration for Diagnosing Gastric Subepithelial Tumors.

Authors:  Hee Kyong Na; Jeong Hoon Lee; Young Soo Park; Ji Yong Ahn; Kwi-Sook Choi; Do Hoon Kim; Kee Don Choi; Ho June Song; Gin Hyug Lee; Hwoon-Yong Jung; Jin-Ho Kim
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2015-03-27

10.  Sigmoid endometriosis diagnosed preoperatively using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.

Authors:  Kenichi Kishimoto; Kousaku Kawashima; Ichiro Moriyama; Mayumi Okada; Shohei Sumi; Hiroki Sonoyama; Naoki Oshima; Ryoji Hyakudomi; Yoshitsugu Tajima; Mamiko Nagase; Noriyoshi Ishikawa; Riruke Maruyama; Shunji Ishihara; Yoshikazu Kinoshita
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.