Literature DB >> 19393935

Results after 562 total elbow replacements: a report from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

Bjørg-Tilde S Fevang1, Stein A Lie, Leif I Havelin, Arne Skredderstuen, Ove Furnes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to give results of elbow arthroplasty for a relatively large population and compare different prosthesis brands and different patient subgroups.
METHODS: Between 1994 and 2006, 562 total elbow replacement operations were reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Revisions of prostheses were shown using Kaplan-Meier failure curves, and risk of revision was calculated using Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: The overall 5- and 10-year failure rates were 8% and 15%, respectively. There were only minor differences between the different implants. Patients who developed traumatic arthritis after fracture had the worst prognosis compared with inflammatory arthritis (P = .005). Risk of revision was also increased when the ulnar component was inserted without cement (P = .02.)
CONCLUSIONS: Good results in terms of prosthesis survival were obtained with total elbow arthroplasty, although results were worse than for knee- and hip arthroplasties. The best results were achieved in patients with inflammatory arthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19393935     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.02.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  29 in total

Review 1.  Total elbow arthroplasty is moving forward: Review on past, present and future.

Authors:  Ante Prkić; Christiaan Ja van Bergen; Bertram The; Denise Eygendaal
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-01-18

2.  [Fracture endoprosthesis of distal humerus fractures].

Authors:  L P Müller; K Wegmann; K J Burkhart
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  What design and material factors impact the wear and corrosion performance in total elbow arthroplasties?

Authors:  Mark P Figgie; Timothy M Wright; Denise Drinkwater
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Sex differences in characteristics, utilization, and outcomes of patient undergoing total elbow arthroplasty: a study of the US nationwide inpatient sample.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Rekha Ramachandran
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Trends in total elbow arthroplasty: a nationwide analysis in Germany from 2005 to 2014.

Authors:  Alexander Klug; Yves Gramlich; Johannes Buckup; Uwe Schweigkofler; Reinhard Hoffmann; Kay Schmidt-Horlohé
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  [Fractures of the distal humerus in the elderly. Pros and cons of endoprosthetic replacement].

Authors:  S-O Dietz; T E Nowak; K J Burkhart; L P Müller; P M Rommens
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 7.  Changing incidence of orthopedic surgery in rheumatic disease: contributing factors.

Authors:  Elana J Bernstein; Lisa A Mandl
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.592

8.  [Arthroplasty for rheumatic elbow joints].

Authors:  G Heers; J Grifka
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.372

9.  Revision total elbow arthroplasty with the linked Coonrad-Morrey total elbow arthroplasty: a retrospective study of twenty procedures.

Authors:  Hans Christian Plaschke; Theis Thillemann; Anne Kathrine Belling-Sørensen; Bo Olsen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Outcome of Semi-Constrained Total Elbow Arthroplasty in Posttraumatic Conditions with Analysis of Bushing Wear on Stress Radiographs.

Authors:  Jenniefer Y Kho; Brian D Adams; Howard O'Rourke
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.