Judy W M Cheng1. 1. Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. judy.cheng@mcphs.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nebivolol is a third-generation beta(1)-selective beta-blocker that is approved for the treatment of hypertension. OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the clinical pharmacology of nebivolol and its efficacy and safety profile in clinical studies of hypertension (the US Food and Drug Administration-approved indication) and heart failure (off-label use). METHODS: Pertinent articles were identified through searches of MEDLINE and Current Contents from 1966 through December 15, 2008, using the terms nebivolol, drug interaction, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacology. The reference lists of the identified publications were reviewed for additional references. Abstracts presented at meetings of the American Heart Association and the American Society of Hypertension from 2006 through 2008 were also reviewed. All human clinical trials were included, regardless of design. RESULTS: Twelve published clinical trials were identified that evaluated the use of nebivolol in the management of hypertension; 1 was placebo controlled, 1 was placebo and active controlled, and 10 involved direct comparisons with other antihypertensive agents. Nebivolol was reported to be as effective in lowering blood pressure (BP) as other beta-blockers (atenolol and bisoprolol), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (lisinopril and enalapril), the angiotensin-receptor blocker telmisartan, and calcium channel blockers (nifedipine and amlodipine). No published studies were identified that evaluated the effect of nebivolol on long-term cardiovascular outcomes. In data from a study in heart failure, nebivolol was associated with a 14% reduction in all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalization at 12 months (P < 0.05). In comparative clinical studies, nebivolol appeared to be well tolerated relative to the other antihypertensive agents studied. The most commonly reported adverse events with nebivolol were fatigue (4%-79%), headache (2%-24%), paresthesia (7%-13%), bradycardia (6%-11%), rhinitis (1%-7%), and dizziness (2%-5%). Because of differences in its pharmacologic properties, nebivolol may have potential advantages in patients who are unable to tolerate traditional beta-blockers (eg, patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or men who experience erectile dysfunction while taking antihypertensive therapy). CONCLUSIONS: Nebivolol is a cardioselective beta-blocker that has been reported to be efficacious and well tolerated for achieving BP control in patients with hypertension. Preliminary evidence suggests a potential for reduced mortality in patients with heart failure.
BACKGROUND:Nebivolol is a third-generation beta(1)-selective beta-blocker that is approved for the treatment of hypertension. OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the clinical pharmacology of nebivolol and its efficacy and safety profile in clinical studies of hypertension (the US Food and Drug Administration-approved indication) and heart failure (off-label use). METHODS: Pertinent articles were identified through searches of MEDLINE and Current Contents from 1966 through December 15, 2008, using the terms nebivolol, drug interaction, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacology. The reference lists of the identified publications were reviewed for additional references. Abstracts presented at meetings of the American Heart Association and the American Society of Hypertension from 2006 through 2008 were also reviewed. All human clinical trials were included, regardless of design. RESULTS: Twelve published clinical trials were identified that evaluated the use of nebivolol in the management of hypertension; 1 was placebo controlled, 1 was placebo and active controlled, and 10 involved direct comparisons with other antihypertensive agents. Nebivolol was reported to be as effective in lowering blood pressure (BP) as other beta-blockers (atenolol and bisoprolol), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (lisinopril and enalapril), the angiotensin-receptor blocker telmisartan, and calcium channel blockers (nifedipine and amlodipine). No published studies were identified that evaluated the effect of nebivolol on long-term cardiovascular outcomes. In data from a study in heart failure, nebivolol was associated with a 14% reduction in all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalization at 12 months (P < 0.05). In comparative clinical studies, nebivolol appeared to be well tolerated relative to the other antihypertensive agents studied. The most commonly reported adverse events with nebivolol were fatigue (4%-79%), headache (2%-24%), paresthesia (7%-13%), bradycardia (6%-11%), rhinitis (1%-7%), and dizziness (2%-5%). Because of differences in its pharmacologic properties, nebivolol may have potential advantages in patients who are unable to tolerate traditional beta-blockers (eg, patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or men who experience erectile dysfunction while taking antihypertensive therapy). CONCLUSIONS:Nebivolol is a cardioselective beta-blocker that has been reported to be efficacious and well tolerated for achieving BP control in patients with hypertension. Preliminary evidence suggests a potential for reduced mortality in patients with heart failure.
Authors: Kyle J Diehl; Brian L Stauffer; Caitlin A Dow; Tyler D Bammert; Danielle L Brunjes; Jared J Greiner; Christopher A DeSouza Journal: Hypertension Date: 2016-04-25 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Alfonso H Santos; Michael J Casey; Charles M Bucci; Shehzad Rehman; Mark S Segal Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2015-12-22 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Seng Chan You; Harlan M Krumholz; Marc A Suchard; Martijn J Schuemie; George Hripcsak; RuiJun Chen; Steven Shea; Jon Duke; Nicole Pratt; Christian G Reich; David Madigan; Patrick B Ryan; Rae Woong Park; Sungha Park Journal: Hypertension Date: 2021-03-29 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Zhen Tan; Zhichao Xiao; Jinhong Wei; Jingqun Zhang; Qiang Zhou; Chris D Smith; Alma Nani; Guogen Wu; Long-Sheng Song; Thomas G Back; Michael Fill; S R Wayne Chen Journal: Biochem J Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 3.766