Literature DB >> 19393784

Evaluation of the Scottsdale Loop 101 automated speed enforcement demonstration program.

Kangwon Shin1, Simon P Washington, Ida van Schalkwyk.   

Abstract

Speeding is recognized as a major contributing factor in traffic crashes. In order to reduce speed-related crashes, the city of Scottsdale, Arizona implemented the first fixed-camera photo speed enforcement program (SEP) on a limited access freeway in the US. The 9-month demonstration program spanning from January 2006 to October 2006 was implemented on a 6.5 mile urban freeway segment of Arizona State Route 101 running through Scottsdale. This paper presents the results of a comprehensive analysis of the impact of the SEP on speeding behavior, crashes, and the economic impact of crashes. The impact on speeding behavior was estimated using generalized least square estimation, in which the observed speeds and the speeding frequencies during the program period were compared to those during other periods. The impact of the SEP on crashes was estimated using 3 evaluation methods: a before-and-after (BA) analysis using a comparison group, a BA analysis with traffic flow correction, and an empirical Bayes BA analysis with time-variant safety. The analysis results reveal that speeding detection frequencies (speeds> or =76 mph) increased by a factor of 10.5 after the SEP was (temporarily) terminated. Average speeds in the enforcement zone were reduced by about 9 mph when the SEP was implemented, after accounting for the influence of traffic flow. All crash types were reduced except rear-end crashes, although the estimated magnitude of impact varies across estimation methods (and their corresponding assumptions). When considering Arizona-specific crash related injury costs, the SEP is estimated to yield about $17 million in annual safety benefits.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19393784     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  3 in total

1.  Do speed cameras reduce collisions?

Authors:  Jeffrey Skubic; Steven B Johnson; Chris Salvino; Steven Vanhoy; Chengcheng Hu
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2013

2.  The effectiveness of introducing detection cameras on compliance with mobile phone and seatbelt laws: a before-after study among drivers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Suliman Alghnam; Jawaher Towhari; Mohamed Alkelya; Abdulaziz Binahmad; Teresa Maria Bell
Journal:  Inj Epidemiol       Date:  2018-08-06

3.  Do speed cameras reduce road traffic collisions?

Authors:  Daniel J Graham; Cian Naik; Emma J McCoy; Haojie Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.