Literature DB >> 19392950

The EASTR study: a new approach to determine the reasons for transfusion in epidemiological studies.

C A Llewelyn1, A W Wells, M Amin, A Casbard, A J Johnson, S Ballard, J Buck, M Malfroy, M F Murphy, L M Williamson.   

Abstract

Previous studies of blood use have used different methods to obtain and classify transfusion indications. Before undertaking a national study of transfusion recipients, a pilot study was performed over 2 months at two teaching and two district general hospitals to match information from hospital transfusion laboratories with clinical coding data from the hospital's Patients Administration System to determine the indication for transfusion in 2468 recipients. Data analysis revealed major limitations in the conventional use of primary diagnostic International Statistical Classification of Disease and Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10) or procedure Office of Population, Censuses and Surveys - Classification of Surgical Operations and Procedures - 4th Revision (OPCS-4) codes alone in allocating transfusion indications. A novel algorithm was developed, using both types of code, to select the probable indication for transfusion for each patient. A primary OPCS-4 code was selected for recipients transfused in relation to surgery (43%) and either the primary (36%) or the secondary (12%) ICD-10 code was chosen for recipients transfused for medical reasons. The remaining patients were unclassified. Selected codes were then collated into Epidemiology and Survival of Transfusion Recipients (EASTR) casemix groups (E-CMGs). The most frequent E-CMGs were haematology (15% of recipients), musculoskeletal (14%), digestive system (12%) and cardiac (10%). The haematology E-CMG includes patients with malignant and non-malignant blood disorders and recipients transfused for anaemia where no cause was listed. Recipients undergoing hip and knee replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting are within the musculoskeletal and cardiac E-CMGs. The digestive E-CMG includes recipients transfused for gastrointestinal (GI) bleeds and those undergoing GI surgery. This methodology provides a more useful means of establishing the probable indication for transfusion and arranging recipients into clinically relevant groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19392950     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2009.00911.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfus Med        ISSN: 0958-7578            Impact factor:   2.019


  6 in total

Review 1.  Molecular virology in transfusion medicine laboratory.

Authors:  Daniel Candotti; Jean-Pierre Allain
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Assessing the Accuracy of Reporting of Maternal Red Blood Cell Transfusion at Birth Reported in Routinely Collected Hospital Data.

Authors:  Jillian A Patterson; Sally Francis; Jane B Ford
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-09

Review 3.  Antifibrinolytics (lysine analogues) for the prevention of bleeding in people with haematological disorders.

Authors:  Lise J Estcourt; Michael Desborough; Susan J Brunskill; Carolyn Doree; Sally Hopewell; Michael F Murphy; Simon J Stanworth
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-15

4.  Pre- and post-transfusion testing for hepatitis B virus surface antigen and antibody in blood recipients: a single-institution experience in an area of high endemicity.

Authors:  Hyeongsu Kim; Mina Hur; Hee-Won Moon; Chul Min Park; Jin-Hee Cho; Kyoung Sik Park; Kunsei Lee; Sounghoon Chang
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  Association of In-Hospital Surgical Bleeding Events with Prolonged Hospital Length of Stay, Days Spent in Critical Care, Complications, and Mortality: A Retrospective Cohort Study Among Patients Undergoing Neoplasm-Directed Surgeries in English Hospitals.

Authors:  Stephen S Johnston; Nadine Jamous; Sameer Mistry; Simran Jain; Gaurav Gangoli; Walter Danker; Eric Ammann; Kingsley Hampton
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2021-01-08

6.  Why was this transfusion given? Identifying clinical indications for blood transfusion in health care data.

Authors:  Loan R van Hoeven; Aukje L Kreuger; Kit Cb Roes; Peter F Kemper; Hendrik Koffijberg; Floris J Kranenburg; Jan Mm Rondeel; Mart P Janssen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 4.790

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.