Literature DB >> 19391688

Estimating ecotoxicological effects of pesticide drift on nontarget arthropods in field hedgerows.

Stefan Otto1, Luca Lazzaro, Antonio Finizio, Giuseppe Zanin.   

Abstract

When hedgerows grow in orchards where pesticides are applied, they can play a double role: Providing a barrier for chemical spray drift and as a refuge for beneficial arthropods such as pollinators and predators. Effectiveness of hedgerows as barriers to drift depends mainly on canopy density (that can be estimated through optical porosity) and wind speed. When optical porosity is low, the hedgerow can intercept a significant amount of spray drift and act as an effective barrier, but the intercepted pesticide can negatively affect the beneficial arthropods living there. A drift model was used to simulate drift in a hedgerow- vineyard system, and a deposition distribution model was used to calculate the pesticide spatial pattern distribution on a hedgerow with different optical porosity and wind speed conditions. The possible ecotoxicological effects were estimated for 28 active ingredients with different median lethal rates for two nontarget arthropods, Aphidius rhopalosiphi and Typhlodromus pyri. A spatialized risk assessment for a hedgerow is suggested to improve procedures based on application rate, standard drift, and vegetation distribution values, as in the hazard quotient approach. An alternative method for calculation of the exposure is also proposed, with a step-by-step example of a toxicity/exposure ratio calculation. The results highlighted the importance of the spatial pattern of drift and proved that a hedgerow can be an effective barrier against spray drift. Analysis of the toxicity/exposure ratio values showed that a hedgerow can continue its shelter and feeding function for nontarget arthropods when low-toxicity pesticides are used, there is no significant wind interference, or both.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19391688     DOI: 10.1897/08-260R.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  5 in total

1.  Exposure of pollinators to plant protection products.

Authors:  Stefania Barmaz; Claudia Vaj; Alessio Ippolito; Marco Vighi
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  A novel method for assessing risks to pollinators from plant protection products using honeybees as a model species.

Authors:  Stefania Barmaz; Simon G Potts; Marco Vighi
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Land conversion and pesticide use degrade forage areas for honey bees in America's beekeeping epicenter.

Authors:  Dan J Dixon; Haochi Zheng; Clint R V Otto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Carryover insecticide exposure reduces bee reproduction across years.

Authors:  Adam G Dolezal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A simple approach for a spatial terrestrial exposure assessment of the insecticide fenoxycarb, based on a high-resolution landscape analysis.

Authors:  Kai Thomas; Herbert Resseler; Robert Spatz; Paul Hendley; Paul Sweeney; Martin Urban; Roland Kubiak
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 4.845

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.