Literature DB >> 19391490

Comparison of running kinematics between elite and national-standard 1500-m runners.

Antti Leskinen1, Keijo Häkkinen, Mikko Virmavirta, Juha Isolehto, Heikki Kyröläinen.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether elite 1500-m runners differ in their running kinematics from national-standard 1500-m runners. Six national-standard male runners (seasonal best: 3 min 49.2 s +/- 3.2 s) were assessed during the second lap of a 1500-m race. Their running kinematics was then compared with those of five elite runners (seasonal best: 3 min 35.6 s +/- 2.6 s) analysed during the second lap of the men's 1500-m final at the 2005 World Championships. Data were collected using two high-speed cameras operating at 200 Hz with a three-dimensional pan and tilt system. Running speed was the same for both groups. Despite the similar contact times, the minimum knee angle during the stance phase was greater and the average extension velocity of the knee angle in the same phase slower in the elite runners than in the national-standard runners. In addition, the running technique of the elite runners appears to be characterized by a more efficient function of the hip joint. In conclusion, elite runners may utilize elastic energy more effectively, which, in combination with minimum concentric work, leads to improvements in their running performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19391490     DOI: 10.1080/14763140802632382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Biomech        ISSN: 1476-3141            Impact factor:   2.832


  5 in total

1.  Running Technique is an Important Component of Running Economy and Performance.

Authors:  Jonathan P Folland; Sam J Allen; Matthew I Black; Joseph C Handsaker; Stephanie E Forrester
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Effect of IMU Design on IMU-Derived Stride Metrics for Running.

Authors:  Michael V Potter; Lauro V Ojeda; Noel C Perkins; Stephen M Cain
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Effects of Wearable Devices with Biofeedback on Biomechanical Performance of Running-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alexandra Giraldo-Pedroza; Winson Chiu-Chun Lee; Wing-Kai Lam; Robyn Coman; Gursel Alici
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Bouncing behavior of sub-four minute milers.

Authors:  Geoffrey T Burns; Richard Gonzalez; Jessica M Zendler; Ronald F Zernicke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Are the knee and ankle angles at contact related to the tendon properties of lower limbs in long distance runners?

Authors:  Keitaro Kubo; Daisuke Miyazaki; Kenji Yamada; Shozo Shimoju; Naoya Tsunoda
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-02-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.