BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of intermittent docetaxel (DCT) with estramustine (EM) for hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). METHODS: Fifteen patients were enrolled. They received injected DCT (70 mg/m2 body surface) on day 1 in association with oral EM 560 mg/day (days 1-5). Treatments were repeated every 3 weeks. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were categorized based on the first three courses. Patients exhibiting either a response or stable disease (SD) could have a holiday from treatment (intermittent schedule). The holiday continued until elevation of the PSA level from the nadir baseline level occurred three times. All patients were evaluated for toxicity and quality of life (QOL). Survival curves were established using Kaplan-Meier graphs. RESULTS: The median number of courses of DCT/EM therapy was five (range, 3-12 courses). The response rate of the first cycle was 53%: 3 patients with complete response (CR), 5 patients with partial response (PR), 4 patients with SD, and 3 patients with disease progression. Eight patients were able to begin the second re-entry cycle. No patients showed a CR, 2 patients exhibited PR, 4 patients had SD, and the overall response rate was 25%. The survival rates were 93% at 1 year, and 26.1% at 2 years Grade 3-4 anemia was observed in 2 patients (13.3%), neutropenia in 11 (73.3%), and thrombocytopenia in 2 (13.3%). The QOL scale showed good QOL after 6 months, with improvement in the score for nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSION: Intermittent DCT/EM therapy was well tolerated, and has the potential to prolong survival, with a high QOL, in patients with HRPC.
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of intermittent docetaxel (DCT) with estramustine (EM) for hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). METHODS: Fifteen patients were enrolled. They received injected DCT (70 mg/m2 body surface) on day 1 in association with oral EM 560 mg/day (days 1-5). Treatments were repeated every 3 weeks. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were categorized based on the first three courses. Patients exhibiting either a response or stable disease (SD) could have a holiday from treatment (intermittent schedule). The holiday continued until elevation of the PSA level from the nadir baseline level occurred three times. All patients were evaluated for toxicity and quality of life (QOL). Survival curves were established using Kaplan-Meier graphs. RESULTS: The median number of courses of DCT/EM therapy was five (range, 3-12 courses). The response rate of the first cycle was 53%: 3 patients with complete response (CR), 5 patients with partial response (PR), 4 patients with SD, and 3 patients with disease progression. Eight patients were able to begin the second re-entry cycle. No patients showed a CR, 2 patients exhibited PR, 4 patients had SD, and the overall response rate was 25%. The survival rates were 93% at 1 year, and 26.1% at 2 years Grade 3-4 anemia was observed in 2 patients (13.3%), neutropenia in 11 (73.3%), and thrombocytopenia in 2 (13.3%). The QOL scale showed good QOL after 6 months, with improvement in the score for nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSION: Intermittent DCT/EM therapy was well tolerated, and has the potential to prolong survival, with a high QOL, in patients with HRPC.
Authors: L Beex; C Rose; H Mouridsen; J Jassem; M Nooij; J Estape; R Paridaens; M Piccart; T Gorlia; S Lardenoije; L Baila Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2006-10-12 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Victoria J Sinibaldi; Michael A Carducci; Sandra Moore-Cooper; Menachem Laufer; Marianna Zahurak; Mario A Eisenberger Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-03-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Daniel P Petrylak; Catherine M Tangen; Maha H A Hussain; Primo N Lara; Jeffrey A Jones; Mary Ellen Taplin; Patrick A Burch; Donna Berry; Carol Moinpour; Manish Kohli; Mitchell C Benson; Eric J Small; Derek Raghavan; E David Crawford Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ian F Tannock; Ronald de Wit; William R Berry; Jozsef Horti; Anna Pluzanska; Kim N Chi; Stephane Oudard; Christine Théodore; Nicholas D James; Ingela Turesson; Mark A Rosenthal; Mario A Eisenberger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tomasz M Beer; Christopher W Ryan; Peter M Venner; Daniel P Petrylak; Gurkamal S Chatta; J Dean Ruether; Kim N Chi; James Young; W David Henner Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860