Literature DB >> 19389988

Laboratory evaluation of 3M Petrifilms and University of Minnesota Bi-plates as potential on-farm tests for clinical mastitis.

J L McCarron1, G P Keefe, S L B McKenna, I R Dohoo, D E Poole.   

Abstract

The objective was to determine test characteristics and compare 2 potential on-farm culture systems for clinical mastitis, the Minnesota Easy Culture System II Bi-plate and Petrifilm. The tests were evaluated using clinically positive mastitic milk samples (n = 282) to determine their ability to differentiate appropriate treatment groups; all cases that had gram-positive growth were considered treatment candidates (n = 161), whereas cases that grew gram-negative organisms only or yielded no bacterial growth were classified as no treatment (n = 121). For Petrifilm, both undiluted and 1:10 diluted milk samples were used. To create treatment categories, 2 types of Petrifilms were used, Aerobic Count (AC) and Coliform Count (CC). Both Bi-plates and Petrifilms were read after 24 h of incubation. Analysis was conducted at various colony count thresholds for the Petrifilm test system. The combination of Petrifilms that had the highest sensitivity classified a case as gram-negative if there were > or =20 colonies present on the CC. If there were <20 colonies present on the CC and >5 colonies present on the AC, a case would be classified as gram-positive. The Bi-plate had a sensitivity of 97.9% and a specificity of 68.6%. The Petrifilm test system had a sensitivity of 93.8% and a specificity of 70.1%. There was no significant difference in the sensitivities between the tests. All Bi-plates and Petrifilms were read by a laboratory technician and a group of masked readers with limited microbiology training. Kappa values for the masked readers were 0.75 for Bi-plates and 0.84 and 0.86 for AC and CC Petrifilms, respectively. The Bi-plate and Petrifilm were able to successfully categorize clinical cases of mastitis into 2 treatments based on their ability to detect the presence of a gram-positive organism. Neither method had the ability to determine if a sample was contaminated. The results of this study indicate that both tests were able to appropriately categorize cases, which could potentially result in a reduction in the quantity of antibiotics used to treat clinical cases of mastitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19389988     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-1661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of an On-Farm Culture System (Accumast) for Fast Identification of Milk Pathogens Associated with Clinical Mastitis in Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Erika Korzune Ganda; Rafael Sisconeto Bisinotto; Dean Harrison Decter; Rodrigo Carvalho Bicalho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Technological interventions and advances in the diagnosis of intramammary infections in animals with emphasis on bovine population-a review.

Authors:  Sandip Chakraborty; Kuldeep Dhama; Ruchi Tiwari; Mohd Iqbal Yatoo; Sandip Kumar Khurana; Rekha Khandia; Ashok Munjal; Palanivelu Munuswamy; M Asok Kumar; Mithilesh Singh; Rajendra Singh; Vivek Kumar Gupta; Wanpen Chaicumpa
Journal:  Vet Q       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.320

3.  Evaluation of Petrifilms(TM) as a diagnostic test to detect bovine mastitis organisms in Kenya.

Authors:  George K Gitau; Royford M Bundi; John Vanleeuwen; Charles M Mulei
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Comparative effectiveness of individualised homeopathy and antibiotics in the treatment of bovine clinical mastitis: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Diana Keller; Albert Sundrum
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 2.695

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.