Literature DB >> 19389888

A prospective study of causes of haemolysis during venepuncture: tourniquet time should be kept to a minimum.

S Saleem1, V Mani, M A Chadwick, S Creanor, R M Ayling.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Haemolysis is defined as the release of cellular components of erythrocytes and other blood cells into the extracellular space of blood. These cellular components can cause interference in laboratory measurements, potassium being a commonly measured analyte to be affected. A number of factors have been implicated in the aetiology of haemolysis. We undertook this study to enable us to identify and hence rectify causes of haemolysis in samples from patients on acute medical and surgical wards.
METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 353 blood sampling events during February and March 2007. A proforma was used to obtain detailed information of each blood-taking episode. Information from the proforma was linked to the incidence of haemolysis obtained from the hospital computer system.
RESULTS: The incidence of haemolysis among the samples studied was 6.5%. While staff group, method of sampling, tourniquet time and number of attempts at venepuncture were each univariately associated with haemolysis, stepwise logistic regression resulted in a final model which only included tourniquet time (odds ratio for haemolysis if tourniquet time >1 min was 19.5 [95% confidence interval [CI] 5.6-67.4%]).
CONCLUSION: Tourniquet time of more than a minute is associated with a significant increase in risk of haemolysis. Advice on tourniquet time is included in phlebotomy training within the hospital; hence a campaign of appropriately channelled continuing education on this issue may be successful in reducing the haemolysis rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19389888     DOI: 10.1258/acb.2009.008228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0004-5632            Impact factor:   2.057


  7 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of practices to reduce blood sample hemolysis in EDs: a laboratory medicine best practices systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas J Heyer; James H Derzon; Linda Winges; Colleen Shaw; Diana Mass; Susan R Snyder; Paul Epner; James H Nichols; Julie A Gayken; Dennis Ernst; Edward B Liebow
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.281

Review 2.  Current Methods of Haemolysis Detection and Reporting as a Source of Risk to Patient Safety: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Euan J McCaughey; Elia Vecellio; Rebecca Lake; Ling Li; Leslie Burnett; Douglas Chesher; Stephen Braye; Mark Mackay; Stephanie Gay; Tony C Badrick; Johanna I Westbrook; Andrew Georgiou
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2016-12

3.  Findings of Phlebotomy Practices in Kenya in 2010: Need for Action.

Authors:  Daniel Kimani; Rachel Kamau; Renuka Gadde; Dejana Selenic; Stephen Maina; Lawrence Marum; Gao Hongjiang; Samuel Mwalili; Anthony Marfin; Jane Mwangi
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  The practice of venous blood collection among laboratory and non-laboratory professionals working in Ethiopian Government Hospitals: a comparative study.

Authors:  Mulugeta Melkie; Abel Girma; Tsegaye Tsalla
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Errors in potassium measurement: a laboratory perspective for the clinician.

Authors:  Jaya R Asirvatham; Viju Moses; Loring Bjornson
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2013-04

6.  Vacuum-venipuncture skills: time required and importance of tube order.

Authors:  Chieko Fujii
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2013-08-05

7.  Reverse pseudohyperkalemia is more than leukocytosis: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Osama El Shamy; Joshua L Rein; Siddhartha Kattamanchi; Jaime Uribarri; Joseph A Vassalotti
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2020-09-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.