OBJECTIVES: To investigate the possible necessity of an increase in lopinavir dose during pregnancy in order to achieve the concentrations previously defined as predictive of virological efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Lopinavir pharmacokinetics were investigated by a population approach performed on 145 HIV-infected women, including 74 pregnant women. The final model was used to determine the probability of achievement of the target trough concentrations by Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS: The typical population estimates (inter-individual variability %) of apparent clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution were 4.38 L/h (24%) and 58.4 L (59%), respectively. Pregnancy associated with a gestational age >15 weeks and delivery were found to increase lopinavir CL/F by 39% and 58%, respectively. With the standard 400 mg twice-a-day regimen, the probability of reaching the 1 mg/L target trough concentration for protease inhibitor (PI)-naive patients was 99% and 96% for non-pregnant and pregnant women, respectively. An important decrease in the probability of achieving the 5.7 mg/L target trough concentration for salvage therapy was observed for non-pregnant women (55%), this decrease being even greater for pregnant women (21%). Raising the lopinavir dose to 600 mg twice daily increased these probabilities to 87% and 53% for non-pregnant and pregnant women, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Modification of the lopinavir dose is unlikely to be required for PI-naive pregnant women; however, in pregnant women who have previously received a PI, therapeutic drug monitoring and/or empirical increasing of the dose should be considered.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the possible necessity of an increase in lopinavir dose during pregnancy in order to achieve the concentrations previously defined as predictive of virological efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Lopinavir pharmacokinetics were investigated by a population approach performed on 145 HIV-infectedwomen, including 74 pregnant women. The final model was used to determine the probability of achievement of the target trough concentrations by Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS: The typical population estimates (inter-individual variability %) of apparent clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution were 4.38 L/h (24%) and 58.4 L (59%), respectively. Pregnancy associated with a gestational age >15 weeks and delivery were found to increase lopinavir CL/F by 39% and 58%, respectively. With the standard 400 mg twice-a-day regimen, the probability of reaching the 1 mg/L target trough concentration for protease inhibitor (PI)-naive patients was 99% and 96% for non-pregnant and pregnant women, respectively. An important decrease in the probability of achieving the 5.7 mg/L target trough concentration for salvage therapy was observed for non-pregnant women (55%), this decrease being even greater for pregnant women (21%). Raising the lopinavir dose to 600 mg twice daily increased these probabilities to 87% and 53% for non-pregnant and pregnant women, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Modification of the lopinavir dose is unlikely to be required for PI-naive pregnant women; however, in pregnant women who have previously received a PI, therapeutic drug monitoring and/or empirical increasing of the dose should be considered.
Authors: Tim R Cressey; Saik Urien; Edmund V Capparelli; Brookie M Best; Sudanee Buranabanjasatean; Aram Limtrakul; Boonsong Rawangban; Prapan Sabsanong; Jean-Marc Treluyer; Gonzague Jourdain; Alice Stek; Marc Lallemant; Mark Mirochnick Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2014-09-25 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: M Nikanjam; E G Chadwick; B Robbins; C Alvero; P Palumbo; R Yogev; J Pinto; R Hazra; M L Hughes; B E Heckman; E V Capparelli Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2011-12-21 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Kun Wang; David Z D'Argenio; Edward P Acosta; Anandi N Sheth; Cecile Delille; Jeffrey L Lennox; Corenna Kerstner-Wood; Ighovwerha Ofotokun Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: R L Shapiro; M D Hughes; A Ogwu; D Kitch; S Lockman; C Moffat; J Makhema; S Moyo; I Thior; K McIntosh; E van Widenfelt; J Leidner; K Powis; A Asmelash; E Tumbare; S Zwerski; U Sharma; E Handelsman; K Mburu; O Jayeoba; E Moko; S Souda; E Lubega; M Akhtar; C Wester; R Tuomola; W Snowden; M Martinez-Tristani; L Mazhani; M Essex Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-06-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Imke H Bartelink; Rada M Savic; Julia Mwesigwa; Jane Achan; Tamara Clark; Albert Plenty; Edwin Charlebois; Moses Kamya; Sera L Young; Monica Gandhi; Diane Havlir; Deborah Cohan; Francesca Aweeka Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2013-09-21 Impact factor: 3.126