OBJECTIVES: The objective was to determine whether the routine packing of simple cutaneous abscesses after incision and drainage (I&D) confers any benefit over I&D alone. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, single-blinded trial, subjects with simple cutaneous abscesses (less than 5 cm largest diameter) underwent incision, drainage, irrigation, and standard abscess preparation in the usual manner. Subjects were then randomized to either packing or no-packing. Visual analog scales (VAS; 100 mm) of pain were recorded in the emergency department (ED). All patients received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), ibuprofen, and narcotic prescriptions, recorded twice daily VAS pain scores, and returned in 48 hours at which time dressings and packing, if present, were removed and a physician blinded to the randomization and not part of the initial visit repeated measurements and determined the need for further intervention. RESULTS:Forty-eight subjects were included in the final analysis. There were no significant differences in age, sex, abscess location, or initial pain scores between the two groups. There was no significant difference in need for a second intervention at the 48-hour follow-up between the packed (4 of 23 subjects) and nonpacked (5 of 25 subjects) groups (p = 0.72; relative risk = 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.4 to 4.2). Patients in the group that received packing reported higher pain scores immediately postprocedure (mean difference = 23.8 mm; p = 0.014, 95% CI = 5 to 42 mm) and at 48 hours postprocedure (mean difference = 16.4 mm; p = 0.03, 95% CI = 1.6 to 31.2 mm), as well as greater use of ibuprofen (mean difference = 0.32; p = 0.12, 95% CI = -1.4 to 2.0) and oxycodone/acetaminophen (mean difference = 2.19; p = 0.03, 95% CI = 0.2 to 4.1). CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, not packing simple cutaneous abscesses did not result in any increased morbidity, and patients reported less pain and used fewer pain medications than packed patients.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: The objective was to determine whether the routine packing of simple cutaneous abscesses after incision and drainage (I&D) confers any benefit over I&D alone. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, single-blinded trial, subjects with simple cutaneous abscesses (less than 5 cm largest diameter) underwent incision, drainage, irrigation, and standard abscess preparation in the usual manner. Subjects were then randomized to either packing or no-packing. Visual analog scales (VAS; 100 mm) of pain were recorded in the emergency department (ED). All patients received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), ibuprofen, and narcotic prescriptions, recorded twice daily VAS pain scores, and returned in 48 hours at which time dressings and packing, if present, were removed and a physician blinded to the randomization and not part of the initial visit repeated measurements and determined the need for further intervention. RESULTS: Forty-eight subjects were included in the final analysis. There were no significant differences in age, sex, abscess location, or initial pain scores between the two groups. There was no significant difference in need for a second intervention at the 48-hour follow-up between the packed (4 of 23 subjects) and nonpacked (5 of 25 subjects) groups (p = 0.72; relative risk = 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.4 to 4.2). Patients in the group that received packing reported higher pain scores immediately postprocedure (mean difference = 23.8 mm; p = 0.014, 95% CI = 5 to 42 mm) and at 48 hours postprocedure (mean difference = 16.4 mm; p = 0.03, 95% CI = 1.6 to 31.2 mm), as well as greater use of ibuprofen (mean difference = 0.32; p = 0.12, 95% CI = -1.4 to 2.0) and oxycodone/acetaminophen (mean difference = 2.19; p = 0.03, 95% CI = 0.2 to 4.1). CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, not packing simple cutaneous abscesses did not result in any increased morbidity, and patients reported less pain and used fewer pain medications than packed patients.
Authors: Nikola Kojic; Eleanor M Pritchard; Hu Tao; Mark A Brenckle; Jessica P Mondia; Bruce Panilaitis; Fiorenzo Omenetto; David L Kaplan Journal: Adv Funct Mater Date: 2012-09-25 Impact factor: 18.808
Authors: A P Perera; A M Howell; M H Sodergren; H Farne; A Darzi; S Purkayastha; P Paraskeva Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2014-07-23 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Michael S Pulia; Mary R Calderone; John R Meister; Jamie Santistevan; Larissa May Journal: Curr Infect Dis Rep Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 3.725
Authors: Owen Thomas; Alistair Ramsay; Marina Yiasemidou; Claire Hardie; Daniel Ashmore; Christopher Macklin; Dibyendu Bandyopadhyay; Joshua R Burke; David Jayne Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) Date: 2020-11-27
Authors: Brigitte M Baumann; Christopher J Russo; Daniel Pavlik; Tara Cassidy-Smith; Naomi Brown; Alfred Sacchetti; Lisa M Capano-Wehrle; Rakesh D Mistry Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2011-05
Authors: Gillian Schmitz; Tress Goodwin; Adam Singer; Chad S Kessler; David Bruner; Hollynn Larrabee; Larissa May; Samuel D Luber; Justin Williams; Rahul Bhat Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2013-02
Authors: Stella R Smith; Katy Newton; Jennifer A Smith; Jo C Dumville; Zipporah Iheozor-Ejiofor; Lyndsay E Pearce; Paul J Barrow; Laura Hancock; James Hill Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-08-26
Authors: Larissa S May; Mark Zocchi; Catherine Zatorski; Jeanne A Jordan; Richard E Rothman; Chelsea E Ware; Samantha Eells; Loren Miller Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2015-10-20