Mark D Meadowcroft1, James R Connor, Michael B Smith, Qing X Yang. 1. Department of Radiology (Center for NMR Research), Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between MR image contrast associated with beta-amyloid (Abeta) plaques and their histology and compare the histopathological basis of image contrast and the relaxation mechanism associated with Abeta plaques in human Alzheimer's disease (AD) and transgenic APP/PS1 mouse tissues. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With the aid of the previously developed histological coil, T(2) (*)-weighted images and R(2) (*) parametric maps were directly compared with histology stains acquired from the same set of Alzheimer's and APP/PS1 tissue slices. RESULTS: The electron microscopy and histology images revealed significant differences in plaque morphology and associated iron concentration between AD and transgenic APP/PS1 mice tissue samples. For AD tissues, T(2) (*) contrast of Abeta-plaques was directly associated with the gradation of iron concentration. Plaques with significantly less iron load in the APP/PS1 animal tissues are equally conspicuous as the human plaques in the MR images. CONCLUSION: These data suggest a duality in the relaxation mechanism where both high focal iron concentration and highly compact fibrillar beta-amyloid masses cause rapid proton transverse magnetization decay. For human tissues, the former mechanism is likely the dominant source of R(2) (*) relaxation; for APP/PS1 animals, the latter is likely the major cause of increased transverse proton relaxation rate in Abeta plaques. The data presented are essential for understanding the histopathological underpinning of MRI measurement associated with Abeta plaques in humans and animals.
PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between MR image contrast associated with beta-amyloid (Abeta) plaques and their histology and compare the histopathological basis of image contrast and the relaxation mechanism associated with Abeta plaques in humanAlzheimer's disease (AD) and transgenicAPP/PS1mouse tissues. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With the aid of the previously developed histological coil, T(2) (*)-weighted images and R(2) (*) parametric maps were directly compared with histology stains acquired from the same set of Alzheimer's and APP/PS1 tissue slices. RESULTS: The electron microscopy and histology images revealed significant differences in plaque morphology and associated iron concentration between AD and transgenicAPP/PS1mice tissue samples. For AD tissues, T(2) (*) contrast of Abeta-plaques was directly associated with the gradation of iron concentration. Plaques with significantly less iron load in the APP/PS1 animal tissues are equally conspicuous as the human plaques in the MR images. CONCLUSION: These data suggest a duality in the relaxation mechanism where both high focal iron concentration and highly compact fibrillar beta-amyloid masses cause rapid proton transverse magnetization decay. For human tissues, the former mechanism is likely the dominant source of R(2) (*) relaxation; for APP/PS1 animals, the latter is likely the major cause of increased transverse proton relaxation rate in Abeta plaques. The data presented are essential for understanding the histopathological underpinning of MRI measurement associated with Abeta plaques in humans and animals.
Authors: E Mark Haacke; Norman Y C Cheng; Michael J House; Qiang Liu; Jaladhar Neelavalli; Robert J Ogg; Asadullah Khan; Muhammad Ayaz; Wolff Kirsch; Andre Obenaus Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: J Vymazal; R A Brooks; C Baumgarner; V Tran; D Katz; J W Bulte; R Bauminger; G Di Chiro Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 1996-01 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Hans Weber; Nicoleta Baxan; Dominik Paul; Julian Maclaren; Daniel Schmidig; Mohammad Mohammadzadeh; Jürgen Hennig; Dominik von Elverfeldt Journal: MAGMA Date: 2011-02-18 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Yue Zhao; Marcus E Raichle; Jie Wen; Tammie L Benzinger; Anne M Fagan; Jason Hassenstab; Andrei G Vlassenko; Jie Luo; Nigel J Cairns; Jon J Christensen; John C Morris; Dmitriy A Yablonskiy Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Vijay Antharam; Joanna F Collingwood; John-Paul Bullivant; Mark R Davidson; Saurav Chandra; Albina Mikhaylova; Mary E Finnegan; Christopher Batich; John R Forder; Jon Dobson Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-08-16 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: J M G van Bergen; X Li; F C Quevenco; A F Gietl; V Treyer; R Meyer; A Buck; P A Kaufmann; R M Nitsch; P C M van Zijl; C Hock; P G Unschuld Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Laurel O Sillerud; Nathan O Solberg; Ryan Chamberlain; Robert A Orlando; John E Heidrich; David C Brown; Christina I Brady; Thomas A Vander Jagt; Michael Garwood; David L Vander Jagt Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2013 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Parastou Foroutan; Melissa E Murray; Shinsuke Fujioka; Katherine J Schweitzer; Dennis W Dickson; Zbigniew K Wszolek; Samuel C Grant Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-11-14 Impact factor: 11.105