Literature DB >> 19387671

Computer-assisted antetorsion control prevents malrotation in femoral nailing: an experimental study and preliminary clinical case series.

Thomas Gösling1, M Oszwald, D Kendoff, M Citak, C Krettek, T Hufner.   

Abstract

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The effect of fluoroscopy-based navigation for femoral fracture reduction on the prevention of malrotation was examined in an experimental setting followed by a first case series. Eleven cadaver femurs were used. All femurs were reduced by closed methods. An optoelectronic navigation system was utilized to check for fragment reduction and alignment. Fluoroscopic control without navigation was used as the control group. The Six Sigma Analysis [offset capability index (C (pk)) = 1.3] was used to compare the probability of outliers of more than 15 degrees . In the clinical case series the same navigation tool was used in ten non-consecutive patients with femoral fractures. Torsional differences between both legs were measured postoperatively by CT scan.
RESULTS: The highest malrotation in the navigated group was 7.0 degrees for the cadaver testings, while two femurs in the control group showed a difference of more than 10 degrees (10.3 degrees , 17.4 degrees). Only the navigated group showed a sufficient offset capability index (C (pk-navigated) = 1.83; C (pk-conventional) = 0.59). In the clinical series nine femurs were successfully reduced by navigation control. The average malrotation was 6.6 degrees . No patient had a torsional difference of more than 10 degrees.
CONCLUSION: Navigated femoral nailing reduces the risk for outliers of postoperative torsional differences and might avoid revision surgery for malrotation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19387671     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-009-0871-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  7 in total

1.  Computer-Assisted Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery.

Authors:  Timo Stübig; Henning Windhagen; Christian Krettek; Max Ettinger
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Can fluoroscopy-based computer navigation improve entry point selection for intramedullary nailing of femur fractures?

Authors:  Meghan C Crookshank; Max R Edwards; Michael Sellan; Cari M Whyne; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Does MIPO of fractures of the distal femur result in more rotational malalignment than ORIF? A retrospective study.

Authors:  M Lill; R Attal; A Rudisch; M C Wick; M Blauth; M Lutz
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Comparison of fluoroscopic techniques for assessment of femoral rotational alignment.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Lieberman; Kirsten Jansen; Laurel Mast; Jacqueline M Brady; Brad J Yoo
Journal:  OTA Int       Date:  2018-05-16

5.  Rotational malalignment in femoral nailing: prevention, diagnosis and surgical correction.

Authors:  Luigi Branca Vergano; Gianluca Coviello; Mauro Monesi
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-12-30

6.  The cortical step sign fails to prevent malrotation of a nailed femoral shaft fracture: a case report.

Authors:  Taranjit Tung; Ted Tufescu
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2014-01-29

7.  3D atlas-based registration can calculate malalignment of femoral shaft fractures in six degrees of freedom.

Authors:  Meghan C Crookshank; Maarten Beek; Michael R Hardisty; Emil H Schemitsch; Cari M Whyne
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2014-04-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.