Literature DB >> 19387619

Solid phase extraction for removal of matrix effects in lipophilic marine toxin analysis by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Arjen Gerssen1, Mairead A McElhinney, Patrick P J Mulder, Ronel Bire, Philipp Hess, Jacob de Boer.   

Abstract

The potential of solid phase extraction (SPE) clean-up has been assessed to reduce matrix effects (signal suppression or enhancement) in the liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis of lipophilic marine toxins. A large array of ion-exchange, silica-based, and mixed-function SPE sorbents was tested. Polymeric sorbents were found to retain most of the toxins. Optimization experiments were carried out to maximize recoveries and the effectiveness of the clean-up. In LC-MS/MS analysis, the observed matrix effects can depend on the chromatographic conditions used, therefore, two different HPLC methods were tested, using either an acidic or an alkaline mobile phase. The recovery of the optimized SPE protocol was around 90% for all toxins studied and no break-through was observed. The matrix effects were determined by comparing signal response from toxins spiked in crude and SPE-cleaned extracts with those derived from toxins prepared in methanol. In crude extracts, all toxins suffered from matrix effects, although in varying amounts. The most serious effects were observed for okadaic acid (OA) and pectenotoxin-2 (PTX2) in the positive electrospray ionization mode (ESI(+)). SPE clean-up on polymeric sorbents in combination with the alkaline LC method resulted in a substantial reduction of matrix effects to less than 15% (apparent recovery between 85 and 115%) for OA, yessotoxin (YTX) in ESI(-) and azaspiracid-1 (AZA1), PTX2, 13-desmethyl spirolides C (SPX1), and gymnodimine (GYM) in ESI(+). In combination with the acidic LC method, the matrix effects after SPE were also reduced but nevertheless approximately 30% of the matrix effects remained for PTX2, SPX1, and GYM in ESI(+). It was concluded that SPE of methanolic shellfish extracts can be very useful for reduction of matrix effects. However, the type of LC and MS methods used is also of great importance. SPE on polymeric sorbents in combination with LC under alkaline conditions was found the most effective method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19387619     DOI: 10.1007/s00216-009-2790-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem        ISSN: 1618-2642            Impact factor:   4.142


  15 in total

1.  Production of monoclonal antibody and application in indirect competitive ELISA for detecting okadaic acid and dinophytoxin-1 in seafood.

Authors:  Shi-Ying Lu; Yu Zhou; Yan-Song Li; Chao Lin; Xian-Mei Meng; Dong-Ming Yan; Zhao-Hui Li; Shi-Yu Yu; Zeng-Shan Liu; Hong-Lin Ren
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  In-house validation of a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for the analysis of lipophilic marine toxins in shellfish using matrix-matched calibration.

Authors:  Arjen Gerssen; Erik H W van Olst; Patrick P J Mulder; Jacob de Boer
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 4.142

3.  Use of biosensors as alternatives to current regulatory methods for marine biotoxins.

Authors:  Natalia Vilariño; Eva S Fonfría; M Carmen Louzao; Luis M Botana
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 4.  Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics: a guide for annotation, quantification and best reporting practices.

Authors:  Saleh Alseekh; Asaph Aharoni; Yariv Brotman; Kévin Contrepois; John D'Auria; Jan Ewald; Jennifer C Ewald; Paul D Fraser; Patrick Giavalisco; Robert D Hall; Matthias Heinemann; Hannes Link; Jie Luo; Steffen Neumann; Jens Nielsen; Leonardo Perez de Souza; Kazuki Saito; Uwe Sauer; Frank C Schroeder; Stefan Schuster; Gary Siuzdak; Aleksandra Skirycz; Lloyd W Sumner; Michael P Snyder; Huiru Tang; Takayuki Tohge; Yulan Wang; Weiwei Wen; Si Wu; Guowang Xu; Nicola Zamboni; Alisdair R Fernie
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 47.990

Review 5.  Dinophysis toxins: causative organisms, distribution and fate in shellfish.

Authors:  Beatriz Reguera; Pilar Riobó; Francisco Rodríguez; Patricio A Díaz; Gemita Pizarro; Beatriz Paz; José M Franco; Juan Blanco
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 5.118

6.  Beta-N-methylamino-L-alanine: LC-MS/MS optimization, screening of cyanobacterial strains and occurrence in shellfish from Thau, a French Mediterranean lagoon.

Authors:  Damien Réveillon; Eric Abadie; Véronique Séchet; Luc Brient; Véronique Savar; Michèle Bardouil; Philipp Hess; Zouher Amzil
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 5.118

7.  Occurrence and Seasonal Variations of Lipophilic Marine Toxins in Commercial Clam Species along the Coast of Jiangsu, China.

Authors:  Xin-Zhi Wang; Ying Cheng; Na Li; Hong-Mei Wen; Rui Liu; Chen-Xiao Shan; Chuan Chai; Hao Wu
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-25       Impact factor: 4.546

8.  Profiling of Brevetoxin Metabolites Produced by Karenia brevis 165 Based on Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Huihui Shen; Xiuxian Song; Yue Zhang; Peipei Zhang; Jing Li; Weijia Song; Zhiming Yu
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 9.  Potential Threats Posed by New or Emerging Marine Biotoxins in UK Waters and Examination of Detection Methodologies Used for Their Control: Cyclic Imines.

Authors:  Keith Davidson; Clothilde Baker; Cowan Higgins; Wendy Higman; Sarah Swan; Andrea Veszelovszki; Andrew D Turner
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 5.118

10.  Profiling of Extracellular Toxins Associated with Diarrhetic Shellfish Poison in Prorocentrum lima Culture Medium by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Lei Pan; Junhui Chen; Huihui Shen; Xiuping He; Guangjiu Li; Xincheng Song; Deshan Zhou; Chengjun Sun
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 4.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.