Literature DB >> 19387562

[Pain and dysesthesia following total extraperitoneal hernia repair].

J C Lauscher1, K Yafaei, H J Buhr, J-P Ritz.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive repair with alloplastic material for inguinal hernia has become a method with few complications and a low recurrence rate. Persistent pain and dysesthesia years after the procedure are however of growing clinical interest. It is still unknown to what degree initial pain or dysesthesia change in the long term. Therefore this study was done to evaluate patient complaints following total extraperitoneal repair (TER) over a long observation period.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Included in the study were patients from January 2000 to December 2006 who were treated electively for uni- or bilateral inguinal hernia using TER. Exclusion criteria were emergency procedures, incarcerated hernia, and scrotal hernia. The patient data were collected using a prospective online data system and evaluation of long-term results via standardized questionnaires determining persisting pain, dysesthesia, physical limitations from the surgery, satisfaction with the operation, and recurrences. The patients were grouped according to length of follow-up after surgery: 12-36 months (group 1), 37-60 months (group 2), and 61-96 months (group 3).
RESULTS: Since January 2000, 484 patients 18 to 97 years old with 620 inguinal hernias were operated. Of those, 349 were evaluated for this study (proportion of returned questionnaires: 72.1%). No significant differences were noted in patient characteristics or early postoperative complications. The percentage of patients suffering from relevant pain (moderate to severe) dropped significantly: 10.3% (group 1) vs 1.0% (group 2) (P<0.05) and 3.4% (group 3) (P<0.05). No significant differences were found concerning dysesthesia (19.6% in group 1 vs 19.2% in group 3). There were no significant differences in satisfaction with the operation, as 73.8% in group 1, 67.7% in group 2, and 73.3% in group 3 were very satisfied with the results. The number of recurrences increased during the observation period: 1.9% in group 1, 3.1% in group 2, and 5.5% in group 3 (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Total extraperitoneal repair is a reliable method with low recurrence rate and high patient satisfaction. A relevant proportion of patients complain however of pain and dysesthesia persisting over years. The data from this study show that in the long term, pain incidence drops significantly while the rate of dysesthesia remains constant. Long follow-up is needed to evaluate the long-term course of persistent pain. For more precise understanding of the long-term results of herniotomy, prospective randomized studies are needed with accordingly long follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19387562     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-009-1705-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  29 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Prospective study of chronic pain after groin hernia repair.

Authors:  T Callesen; K Bech; H Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Re-recurrence after operation for recurrent inguinal hernia. A nationwide 8-year follow-up study on the role of type of repair.

Authors:  Thue Bisgaard; Morten Bay-Nielsen; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Quality assessment of 26,304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark: a prospective nationwide study.

Authors:  M Bay-Nielsen; H Kehlet; L Strand; J Malmstrøm; F H Andersen; P Wara; P Juul; T Callesen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-10-06       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Cooperative hernia study. Pain in the postrepair patient.

Authors:  J Cunningham; W J Temple; P Mitchell; J A Nixon; R M Preshaw; N A Hagen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Randomized clinical trial of mesh versus non-mesh primary inguinal hernia repair: long-term chronic pain at 10 years.

Authors:  Ruben N van Veen; Arthur R Wijsmuller; Wietske W Vrijland; Wim C J Hop; Johan F Lange; Johannus Jeekel
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair versus open mesh repair: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Magnus Hallén; Anders Bergenfelz; Johan Westerdahl
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 8.  Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia.

Authors:  N W Scott; K McCormack; P Graham; P M Go; S J Ross; A M Grant
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002

Review 9.  A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  Amudha S Poobalan; Julie Bruce; W Cairns S Smith; Peter M King; Zygmunt H Krukowski; W Alastair Chambers
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.442

10.  Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair on a general surgery ward: 5 years' experience.

Authors:  Haggi Mazeh; Nahum Beglaibter; Ronit Grinbaum; Yaacov Samet; Mahmoud Badriyyah; Oded Zamir; Herbert R Freund
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.878

View more
  3 in total

1.  Oligosymptomatic vs. symptomatic incisional hernias--who benefits from open repair?

Authors:  Johannes Christian Lauscher; Stefanie Rieck; Jan C Loh; Jörn Gröne; Heinz J Buhr; Jörg-Peter Ritz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Long-term follow-up after incisional hernia repair: are there only benefits for symptomatic patients?

Authors:  J C Lauscher; J C Loh; S Rieck; H J Buhr; J P Ritz
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Development of a clinical trial to determine whether watchful waiting is an acceptable alternative to surgical repair for patients with oligosymptomatic incisional hernia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Johannes C Lauscher; Peter Martus; Andrea Stroux; Jens Neudecker; Uwe Behrens; Ralf Hammerich; Heinz J Buhr; Jörg-Peter Ritz
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 2.279

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.