OBJECTIVES:Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with cardiac autonomic nervous system dysregulation. This study evaluates the effects of interval hypoxic training on cardiovascular and respiratory control in patients with mild COPD. METHODS: In 18 eucapnic normoxic mild COPD patients (age 51.7 +/- 2.4 years, mean +/- SEM), randomly assigned to either training or placebogroup, and 14 age-matched healthy controls (47.7 +/- 2.8 years), we monitored end-tidal carbon dioxide, airway flow, arterial oxygen saturation, electrocardiogram, and continuous noninvasive blood pressure at rest, during progressive hypercapnic hyperoxia and isocapnic hypoxia to compare baroreflex sensitivity to hypoxia and hypercapnia before and after 3 weeks of hypoxic training. In double-blind fashion, both groups received 15 sessions of passive intermittent hypoxia (training group) or normoxia (placebo group). For the hypoxia group, each session consisted of three to five hypoxic (15-12% oxygen) periods (3-5 min) with 3-min normoxic intervals. The placebo group inhaled normoxic air. RESULTS: Before training, COPD patients showed depressed baroreflex sensitivity, as compared with healthy individuals, without evident chemoreflex abnormalities. After training, in contrast to placebo group, the training group showed increased (P < 0.05) baroreflex sensitivity up to normal levels and selectively increased hypercapnic ventilatory response (P < 0.05), without changes in hypoxic ventilatory response. CONCLUSION:Eucapnic normoxic mild COPD patients already showed signs of cardiovascular autonomic abnormalities at baseline, which normalized with hypoxic training. If confirmed in more severe patients, interval hypoxic training may be a therapeutic strategy to rebalance early autonomic dysfunction in COPD patients.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES:Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with cardiac autonomic nervous system dysregulation. This study evaluates the effects of interval hypoxic training on cardiovascular and respiratory control in patients with mild COPD. METHODS: In 18 eucapnic normoxic mild COPDpatients (age 51.7 +/- 2.4 years, mean +/- SEM), randomly assigned to either training or placebo group, and 14 age-matched healthy controls (47.7 +/- 2.8 years), we monitored end-tidal carbon dioxide, airway flow, arterial oxygen saturation, electrocardiogram, and continuous noninvasive blood pressure at rest, during progressive hypercapnic hyperoxia and isocapnic hypoxia to compare baroreflex sensitivity to hypoxia and hypercapnia before and after 3 weeks of hypoxic training. In double-blind fashion, both groups received 15 sessions of passive intermittent hypoxia (training group) or normoxia (placebo group). For the hypoxia group, each session consisted of three to five hypoxic (15-12% oxygen) periods (3-5 min) with 3-min normoxic intervals. The placebo group inhaled normoxic air. RESULTS: Before training, COPDpatients showed depressed baroreflex sensitivity, as compared with healthy individuals, without evident chemoreflex abnormalities. After training, in contrast to placebo group, the training group showed increased (P < 0.05) baroreflex sensitivity up to normal levels and selectively increased hypercapnic ventilatory response (P < 0.05), without changes in hypoxic ventilatory response. CONCLUSION: Eucapnic normoxic mild COPDpatients already showed signs of cardiovascular autonomic abnormalities at baseline, which normalized with hypoxic training. If confirmed in more severe patients, interval hypoxic training may be a therapeutic strategy to rebalance early autonomic dysfunction in COPDpatients.
Authors: Martin Burtscher; Klemens Mairer; Maria Wille; Hannes Gatterer; Gerhard Ruedl; Martin Faulhaber; Günther Sumann Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2011-04-16 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Martin Burtscher; Hannes Gatterer; Christoph Szubski; Emanuela Pierantozzi; Martin Faulhaber Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2009-08-18 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Melissa A Allwood; Brittany A Edgett; Ashley L Eadie; Jason S Huber; Nadya Romanova; Philip J Millar; Keith R Brunt; Jeremy A Simpson Journal: J Physiol Date: 2018-05-13 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Martin Faulhaber; Tobias Dünnwald; Hannes Gatterer; Luciano Bernardi; Martin Burtscher Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-11-14 Impact factor: 3.240