Literature DB >> 19387100

Dosimetry for the MRI accelerator: the impact of a magnetic field on the response of a Farmer NE2571 ionization chamber.

I Meijsing1, B W Raaymakers, A J E Raaijmakers, J G M Kok, L Hogeweg, B Liu, J J W Lagendijk.   

Abstract

The UMC Utrecht is constructing a 1.5 T MRI scanner integrated with a linear accelerator (Lagendijk et al 2008 Radiother. Oncol. 86 25-9). The goal of this device is to facilitate soft-tissue contrast based image-guided radiotherapy, in order to escalate the dose to the tumour while sparing surrounding normal tissues. Dosimetry for the MRI accelerator has to be performed in the presence of a magnetic field. This paper investigates the feasibility of using a Farmer NE2571 ionization chamber for absolute dosimetry. The impact of the mcagnetic field on the response of this ionization chamber has been measured and simulated using GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulations. Two orientations of the ionization chamber with respect to the incident beam and the magnetic field which are feasible in the MRI accelerator configuration are taken into account. Measurements are performed using a laboratory magnet ranging from 0 to 1.2 T. In the simulations a range from 0 to 2 T is used. For both orientations, the measurements and simulations agreed within the uncertainty of the measurements and simulations. In conclusion, the response of the ionization chamber as a function of the magnetic field is understood and can be simulated using GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19387100     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/10/002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  12 in total

Review 1.  Biological effects of static magnetic field exposure in the context of MR-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jonathan Kim Mohajer; Andrew Nisbet; Eirini Velliou; Mazhar Ajaz; Giuseppe Schettino
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Relative dosimetry with an MR-linac: Response of ion chambers, diamond, and diode detectors for off-axis, depth dose, and output factor measurements.

Authors:  Daniel J O'Brien; James Dolan; Stefan Pencea; Nicholas Schupp; Gabriel O Sawakuchi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Patient-specific quality assurance for the delivery of (60)Co intensity modulated radiation therapy subject to a 0.35-T lateral magnetic field.

Authors:  H Harold Li; Vivian L Rodriguez; Olga L Green; Yanle Hu; Rojano Kashani; H Omar Wooten; Deshan Yang; Sasa Mutic
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Optical imaging method to quantify spatial dose variation due to the electron return effect in an MR-linac.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Andreozzi; Petr Brůža; Jochen Cammin; Brian W Pogue; David J Gladstone; Olga Green
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Effect of Magnetic Field Strength on Plastic Scintillation Detector Response.

Authors:  F Therriault-Proulx; Z Wen; G Ibbott; S Beddar
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 1.898

6.  An analysis of the ArcCHECK-MR diode array's performance for ViewRay quality assurance.

Authors:  Steven T Ellefson; Wesley S Culberson; Bryan P Bednarz; Larry A DeWerd; John E Bayouth
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Technical Note: Consistency of PTW30013 and FC65-G ion chamber magnetic field correction factors.

Authors:  S J Woodings; B van Asselen; T L van Soest; L A de Prez; J J W Lagendijk; B W Raaymakers; J W H Wolthaus
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Impact of magnetic fields on dose measurement with small ion chambers illustrated in high-resolution response maps.

Authors:  Joerg Lehmann; Toby Beveridge; Chris Oliver; Tracy E Bailey; Jessica E Lye; Jayde Livingstone; Andrew W Stevenson; Duncan J Butler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Influence of beam quality on reference dosimetry correction factors in magnetic resonance guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Stefan Pojtinger; Marcel Nachbar; Ralf-Peter Kapsch; Daniela Thorwarth
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-10-27

Review 10.  Medical physics challenges in clinical MR-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Christopher Kurz; Giulia Buizza; Guillaume Landry; Florian Kamp; Moritz Rabe; Chiara Paganelli; Guido Baroni; Michael Reiner; Paul J Keall; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Marco Riboldi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.