BACKGROUND: The rapid expansion in use of capsule endoscopy (CE) has led to discussion about training needs and provision. The lesion recognition skills required for CE are ideally suited to computer-based training. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the educational effectiveness of a computer-based CE training and testing module on trainees with varying experience. DESIGN: This was a prospective educational evaluation study. SETTING: Academic endoscopy unit. PATIENTS: This study involved 28 trainees of varying CE experience (medical students, gastroenterology trainees) and 4 CE experts. INTERVENTION: Trainees (medical students and gastroenterology trainees) without CE experience completed a 60-question, computer-based test module consisting of 30-second video clips and multiple-choice questions. Without feedback, trainees then completed a comprehensive, menu-driven, computer-based CE training module. The test module was then completed a second time and feedback was given. Expert performance on the test module was benchmarked by 4 CE experts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The first measure was the difference in baseline performance on the test module between trainees and experts (to determine construct validity). The second measure was a change in performance on the test module after training (to determine content validity of the training module). RESULTS: A significant difference was noted in baseline performance (P < .001) among CE experts (mean 73.8% +/- 8.0%), gastroenterology trainees (49.5% +/- 10.9%), and medical students (29.5% +/- 3.3%). Performance improved significantly (P < .001) in both trainee groups after training (gastroenterology trainees' posttraining score 62.1% +/- 7.7%; medical students' 46.7% +/- 6.8%). CONCLUSION: Computer-based learning has a potentially significant role in the development of a training syllabus for CE and in CE accreditation.
BACKGROUND: The rapid expansion in use of capsule endoscopy (CE) has led to discussion about training needs and provision. The lesion recognition skills required for CE are ideally suited to computer-based training. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the educational effectiveness of a computer-based CE training and testing module on trainees with varying experience. DESIGN: This was a prospective educational evaluation study. SETTING: Academic endoscopy unit. PATIENTS: This study involved 28 trainees of varying CE experience (medical students, gastroenterology trainees) and 4 CE experts. INTERVENTION: Trainees (medical students and gastroenterology trainees) without CE experience completed a 60-question, computer-based test module consisting of 30-second video clips and multiple-choice questions. Without feedback, trainees then completed a comprehensive, menu-driven, computer-based CE training module. The test module was then completed a second time and feedback was given. Expert performance on the test module was benchmarked by 4 CE experts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The first measure was the difference in baseline performance on the test module between trainees and experts (to determine construct validity). The second measure was a change in performance on the test module after training (to determine content validity of the training module). RESULTS: A significant difference was noted in baseline performance (P < .001) among CE experts (mean 73.8% +/- 8.0%), gastroenterology trainees (49.5% +/- 10.9%), and medical students (29.5% +/- 3.3%). Performance improved significantly (P < .001) in both trainee groups after training (gastroenterology trainees' posttraining score 62.1% +/- 7.7%; medical students' 46.7% +/- 6.8%). CONCLUSION: Computer-based learning has a potentially significant role in the development of a training syllabus for CE and in CE accreditation.
Authors: Cristiano Spada; Deirdre McNamara; Edward J Despott; Samuel Adler; Brooks D Cash; Ignacio Fernández-Urién; Hrvoje Ivekovic; Martin Keuchel; Mark McAlindon; Jean-Christophe Saurin; Simon Panter; Cristina Bellisario; Silvia Minozzi; Carlo Senore; Cathy Bennett; Michael Bretthauer; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro; Dirk Domagk; Cesare Hassan; Michal F Kaminski; Colin J Rees; Roland Valori; Raf Bisschops; Matthew D Rutter Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2019-05-15 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Mark E McAlindon; Clare E Parker; Philip Hendy; Haider Mosea; Simon Panter; Carolyn Davison; Chris Fraser; Edward J Despott; Reena Sidhu; David S Sanders; Richard Makins Journal: Frontline Gastroenterol Date: 2011-12-12
Authors: Melissa F Hale; Carolyn Davison; Simon Panter; Kaye Drew; David S Sanders; Reena Sidhu; Mark E McAlindon Journal: Frontline Gastroenterol Date: 2015-03-06
Authors: Foong Way David Tai; Clare Parker; Reena Sidhu; Mark McAlindon; Carolyn Davison; Geoff V Smith; Simon Panter Journal: Frontline Gastroenterol Date: 2021-05-18
Authors: Reena Sidhu; Mark E McAlindon; Carolyn Davison; Simon Panter; Olaf Humbla; Martin Keuchel Journal: Gastroenterol Res Pract Date: 2012-04-11 Impact factor: 2.260
Authors: J G Albert; O Humbla; M E McAlindon; C Davison; U Seitz; C Fraser; F Hagenmüller; E Noetzel; C Spada; M E Riccioni; J Barnert; N Filmann; M Keuchel Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 1.817