Literature DB >> 19385880

The Anthropologist and the Crayons: Changing our Focus from Avoiding Harm to Doing Good.

Herb Childress1.   

Abstract

THE ETHICAL REVIEW PROCESS is aimed at protecting research participants, evaluating risk in relation to benefit, and, where possible, reducing risk to research participants (and by extension, to the sponsoring organizations). In practice, however, there is usually much focus on risk and little on benefit. However, social research presents an opportunity to give active benefits to many constituents: the research participants, the host community, the researcher and research team members, the sponsoring institution and funding agency, the academic community, and society at large. Even when benefits are considered, the proximal benefits-those that actually accrue during (and because of) the investigator's presence-are too often overlooked by both investigators and ethics committees in favor of the more distal benefits related to the contribution to knowledge. The research design and review processes can both be redirected to focus more centrally on imagining, creating and extending the benefits of our work.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 19385880     DOI: 10.1525/jer.2006.1.2.79

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  3 in total

1.  Community-Engaged Research Ethics Review: Exploring Flexibility in Federal Regulations.

Authors:  Stephanie Solomon Cargill; Debra DeBruin; Milton Eder; Elizabeth Heitman; Julie M Kaberry; Jennifer B McCormick; Jennifer Opp; Richard Sharp; A Hal Strelnick; Sabune J Winkler; Mark Yarborough; Emily E Anderson
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2016 May-Jun

2.  Communications between volunteers and health researchers during recruitment and informed consent: qualitative content analysis of email interactions.

Authors:  Anne Townsend; Zubin Amarsi; Catherine L Backman; Susan M Cox; Linda C Li
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  The ethics of interrogation and the American Psychological Association: a critique of policy and process.

Authors:  Brad Olson; Stephen Soldz; Martha Davis
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 2.464

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.