Literature DB >> 19385804

Normative dissonance in science: results from a national survey of u.s. Scientists.

Melissa S Anderson1, Brian C Martinson, Raymond De Vries.   

Abstract

NORMS OF BEHAVIOR IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH represent ideals to which most scientists subscribe. Our analysis of the extent of dissonance between these widely espoused ideals and scientists' perceptions of their own and others' behavior is based on survey responses from 3,247 mid- and early-career scientists who had research funding from the U.S. National Institutes of Health. We found substantial normative dissonance, particularly between espoused ideals and respondents' perceptions of other scientists' typical behavior. Also, respondents on average saw other scientists' behavior as more counternormative than normative. Scientists' views of their fields as cooperative or competitive were associated with their normative perspectives, with competitive fields showing more counternormative behavior. The high levels of normative dissonance documented here represent a persistent source of stress in science.

Year:  2007        PMID: 19385804     DOI: 10.1525/jer.2007.2.4.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  31 in total

1.  Researcher perceptions of ethical guidelines and codes of conduct.

Authors:  Vincent Giorgini; Jensen T Mecca; Carter Gibson; Kelsey Medeiros; Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly; Lynn D Devenport
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  The assessment of publication pressure in medical science; validity and reliability of a Publication Pressure Questionnaire (PPQ).

Authors:  J K Tijdink; Y M Smulders; A C M Vergouwen; H C W de Vet; D L Knol
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Misconduct and Misbehavior Related to Authorship Disagreements in Collaborative Science.

Authors:  Elise Smith; Bryn Williams-Jones; Zubin Master; Vincent Larivière; Cassidy R Sugimoto; Adèle Paul-Hus; Min Shi; David B Resnik
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Misbehaviors of front-line research personnel and the integrity of community-based research.

Authors:  Gala True; Leslie B Alexander; Kenneth A Richman
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  The Role of Culture and Acculturation in Researchers' Perceptions of Rules in Science.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Tammy English; Kari A Baldwin; James M DuBois
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS. Promoting an open research culture.

Authors:  B A Nosek; G Alter; G C Banks; D Borsboom; S D Bowman; S J Breckler; S Buck; C D Chambers; G Chin; G Christensen; M Contestabile; A Dafoe; E Eich; J Freese; R Glennerster; D Goroff; D P Green; B Hesse; M Humphreys; J Ishiyama; D Karlan; A Kraut; A Lupia; P Mabry; T A Madon; N Malhotra; E Mayo-Wilson; M McNutt; E Miguel; E Levy Paluck; U Simonsohn; C Soderberg; B A Spellman; J Turitto; G VandenBos; S Vazire; E J Wagenmakers; R Wilson; T Yarkoni
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Environmental Factors Contributing to Wrongdoing in Medicine: A Criterion-Based Review of Studies and Cases.

Authors:  James M Dubois; Kelly Carroll; Tyler Gibb; Elena Kraus; Timothy Rubbelke; Meghan Vasher; Emily E Anderson
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2011-11-29

8.  Do pressures to publish increase scientists' bias? An empirical support from US States Data.

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data.

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Marcus R Munafò; Paolo Fusar-Poli; Brian A Nosek; Sean P David
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.