BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective cohort study was to determine whether an immediate postoperative period of deep sedation and artificial respiration in an intensive care unit (ICU) leads to fewer complications and a reduced failure rate of microvascular flaps compared with a situation in which patients are allowed to breathe spontaneously without sedation in a recovery room. METHODS: Each group comprised 50 patients. General medical complications and flap donor and recipient site complications were documented. RESULTS: Significantly, more patients had problems with weaning from ventilation in the ICU group (p = .022). More cases of respiratory insufficiency (p = .240) and pneumonia (p = .081) occurred in the ICU group compared with the recovery room group without statistically significant differences. The number of flaps lost was comparable in both groups (p = .646). CONCLUSIONS: Admission to an ICU did not reduce complications after microvascular reconstruction and, therefore, has only to be considered for selected cases. (c) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2009.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective cohort study was to determine whether an immediate postoperative period of deep sedation and artificial respiration in an intensive care unit (ICU) leads to fewer complications and a reduced failure rate of microvascular flaps compared with a situation in which patients are allowed to breathe spontaneously without sedation in a recovery room. METHODS: Each group comprised 50 patients. General medical complications and flap donor and recipient site complications were documented. RESULTS: Significantly, more patients had problems with weaning from ventilation in the ICU group (p = .022). More cases of respiratory insufficiency (p = .240) and pneumonia (p = .081) occurred in the ICU group compared with the recovery room group without statistically significant differences. The number of flaps lost was comparable in both groups (p = .646). CONCLUSIONS: Admission to an ICU did not reduce complications after microvascular reconstruction and, therefore, has only to be considered for selected cases. (c) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2009.
Authors: Phoebe K Yu; Rosh K V Sethi; Vinay Rathi; Sidharth V Puram; Derrick T Lin; Kevin S Emerick; Marlene L Durand; Daniel G Deschler Journal: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Date: 2018-11-28
Authors: Teresa Bernadette Steinbichler; L Golm; D Dejaco; D Riedl; B Kofler; C Url; D Wolfram; H Riechelmann Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2020-01-25 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Caitlin Bertelsen; Kevin Hur; Margaret Nurimba; Janet Choi; Joseph R Acevedo; Anna Jackanich; Uttam K Sinha; Amit Kochhar; Niels Kokot; Mark Swanson Journal: OTO Open Date: 2020-06-02