| Literature DB >> 19384300 |
A Gaber1, M Johansson, U-H Stenman, K Hotakainen, F Pontén, B Glimelius, A Bjartell, K Jirström, H Birgisson.
Abstract
Increased expression of tumour-associated trypsin inhibitor (TATI) in tumour tissue and/or serum has been associated with poor survival in various cancer forms. Moreover, a proinvasive function of TATI has been shown in colon cancer cell lines. In this study, we have examined the prognostic significance of tumour-specific TATI expression in colorectal cancer, assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on tissue microarrays (TMAs) with tumour specimens from two independent patient cohorts. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards modelling were used to estimate time to recurrence, disease-free survival and overall survival. In both cohorts, a high (>50% of tumour cells) TATI expression was an independent predictor of a significantly shorter overall survival. In cohort II, in multivariate analysis including age, gender, disease stage, differentiation grade, vascular invasion and carcinoembryonal antigen (CEA), high TATI expression was associated with a significantly decreased overall survival (HR=1.82; 95% CI=1.19-2.79) and disease-free survival (HR=1.56; 95% CI=1.05-2.32) in curatively treated patients. Moreover, there was an increased risk for liver metastasis in both cohorts that remained significant in multivariate analysis in cohort II (HR=2.85; 95% CI=1.43-5.66). In conclusion, high TATI expression is associated with liver metastasis and is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19384300 PMCID: PMC2696764 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605047
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Figure 1Immunohistochemical images of invasive cancer with high (A) and low (B) tumour-associated trypsin inhibitor (TATI) score and expression of TATI in adjacent non-malignant mucosa (C).
Correlation betweeen TATI expression and clinicopathological parameters in two colorectal cancer cohorts
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| ⩽75 | 50 (55.6) | 6 (25.0) | 143 (59.3) | 33 (48.5) | ||
| >75 | 40 (44.4) | 18 (75.0) | 0.008 | 98 (40.7) | 35 (51.5) | 0.112 |
|
| ||||||
| Female | 49 (54.4) | 9 (37.5) | 120 (49.8) | 32 (47.1) | ||
| Male | 41 (45.6) | 158 (62.5) | 0.143 | 121 (50.2) | 36 (52.9) | 0.691 |
|
| ||||||
| 1 | 9 (3.7) | 3 (4.4) | ||||
| 2 | 28 (11.6) | 12 (17.6) | ||||
| 3 | 156 (64.7) | 47 (69.1) | ||||
| 4 | 48 (19.9) | 6 (8.8) | 0.142 | |||
|
| ||||||
| 0 | 50(55.6) | 14(58.3) | 138 (57.3) | 42 (61.8) | ||
| 1 | 19(21.1) | 6(25.0) | 46 (19.1) | 16 (23.5) | ||
| 2 | 8(8.9) | 1(4.2) | 0.65 | 57 (23.7) | 10 (14.7) | 0.302 |
| No information | 13(14.4) | 3(12.5) | ||||
|
| ||||||
| I | 24 (26.7) | 11 (45.8) | 31 (12.9) | 13 (19.1) | ||
| II | 35 (38.9) | 5 (20.8) | 101 (41.9) | 26 (38.2) | ||
| III | 28 (31.1) | 5 (20.8) | 75 (31.1) | 23 (33.8) | ||
| IV | 3(3.3) | 3(12.5) | 0.277 | 0.305 | ||
|
| ||||||
| High–moderate | 73 (81.1) | 21 (87.5) | 186 (77.2) | 55 (80.9) | ||
| Poor | 17 (18.9) | 3 (12.5) | 0.46 | 55 (22.8) | 13 (19.1) | 0.515 |
|
| ||||||
| No invasion | 78 (86.7) | 21 (87.5) | 209 (86.7) | 59 (86.8) | ||
| Invasion | 12 (13.3) | 3 (12.5) | 0.915 | 32 (13.3) | 9 (13.2) | 0.993 |
|
| ||||||
| <6 ng ml−1 | 158 (65.6) | 53 (77.9) | ||||
| ⩾6 ng ml−1 | ||||||
| No information | 10 (4.1) | 2 (2.9) | 0.061 | |||
TATI=tumour-associated trypsin inhibitor.
χ2-test of association was used for 2 × 2 tables and χ2-test for linear trend for tables with more than two rows and/or columns.
The number of cases with missing data is given for some variables, but these are not included in the analyses.
Figure 2Tumour-associated trypsin inhibitor (TATI) best score for fraction of immunoreactivity in primary tumour tissue from patients with colorectal cancer and its relation to tumour (T) (A), disease (B) and to lymph node (N) stages (C). Boxes indicate mean (small central box) and mean ±1 s.e. (larger box). Whiskers indicate mean ±1.96 times s.e. Kruskal–Wallis test was used for comparison.
Figure 3Overall survival (A) and disease-free survival (B) in curatively treated patients with colorectal cancer in cohort II according to high (n=61) versus low (n=205) TATI best score (cutoff =50% positive cells).
The relative risks for death in curatively treated patients with colorectal cancer from cohort II
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||
| Age <75 years | 154 | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) | 154 | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) |
| Age ⩾75 years | 123 | 2.39 (1.62–3.52) | 2.74 (1.83–4.09) | 123 | 1.87 (1.32–2.65) | 2.09 (1.46–3.0) |
|
| ||||||
| Female | 137 | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) | 137 | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) |
| Male | 140 | 0.78 (0.53–1.14) | 0.74 (0.50–1.09) | 140 | 0.81 (0.57–1.15) | 0.79 (0.55–1.12 ) |
|
| ||||||
| Stage I | 45 | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) | 45 | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) |
| Stage II | 131 | 1.09 (0.58–2.02) | 1.18 (0.62–2.24) | 131 | 1.57 (0.85–2.87) | 1.64 (0.88–3.05) |
| Stage III | 100 | 1.45 (1.07–1.97) | 1.55 (1.13–2.13) | 100 | 1.62 (1.20–2.19) | 1.69 (1.24–2.31) |
|
| ||||||
| High–moderate | 221 | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) | 221 | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) |
| Poor | 56 | 1.40 (0.90–2.20) | 1.36 (0.87–2.15) | 56 | 1.38 (0.88–2.17) | 1.30 (0.86–1.96) |
|
| ||||||
| No invasion | 252 | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) | 252 | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) |
| Invasion | 25 | 1.68 (0.94–3.01) | 1.64 (0.90–2.99) | 25 | 1.93 (1.15–3.21) | 1.73 (1.02–2.94) |
|
| ||||||
| <6 ng ml−1 | 204 | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) | 277 | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) |
| >6 ng ml−1 | 62 | 1.41 (0.92–2.17) | 1.35 (0.88–2.09) | 0 | 1.56 (1.06–2.29) | 1.48 (1.00–2.20) |
|
| ||||||
| <50% | 205 | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) | 205 | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) |
| >50% | 61 | 1.73 (1.14–2.64) | 1.82 (1.19–2.79) | 61 | 1.52 (1.03–2.25) | 1.56 (1.05–2.32) |
CI=confidence interval; CEA=carcinoembryonal antigen; HR=hazard ratio; TATI=tumour-associated trypsin inhibitor.
Uni- and multivariate analyses, including age, gender, disease stage, differentiation grade, lymphatic or vascular vessel invasion, CEA and TATI fraction of immunoreactivity best score.
Figure 4Time to recurrence (A) and recurrence of liver metastasis (B) in curatively treated patients with colorectal cancer in cohort II according to high (n=61) versus low (n=205) TATI best score (cutoff=50% positive cells).