Literature DB >> 19384116

Cosmetologists and reproductive outcomes.

Lisa Gallicchio1, Susan Miller, Teresa Greene, Howard Zacur, Jodi A Flaws.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that cosmetologists are at increased risk of poor pregnancy outcomes compared with women of the same age who are not cosmetologists.
METHODS: Participants were recruited through mass mailing of questionnaires. To be included in the study, respondents to the survey had to be aged between 21 and 55 years and not have had a hysterectomy or oophorectomy. This analysis focused on 350 cosmetologists and 397 women in other occupations who met these inclusion criteria and who reported five or fewer singleton pregnancies. The main outcome measures were miscarriage, stillbirth, the occurrence of maternal health conditions during pregnancy (preeclampsia, high blood pressure, diabetes), hospitalization or physician-ordered bed rest during pregnancy, preterm labor, and premature delivery (before 37 weeks at delivery).
RESULTS: There were no statistically significant associations between occupation and the pregnancy outcomes after adjustment for age, race, education, and smoking and alcohol use at the time of pregnancy. A statistically significant association was found between race and low birth weight such that nonwhite women were at increased risk of reporting a low birth weight neonate compared with white women (odds ratio [OR] 3.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.53-7.26). Similarly, current smoking was found to be positively associated with miscarriage (OR 1.53, CI 1.09-2.16) and miscarriage or stillbirth (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.18-2.28).
CONCLUSION: Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes among cosmetologists is not increased compared with women of the same age working in other occupations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19384116     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a1f906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of miscarriage and maternal exposure to tobacco smoke during pregnancy.

Authors:  Beth L Pineles; Edward Park; Jonathan M Samet
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  A nested case-control study of low birthweight among cosmetologists.

Authors:  Michele L Herdt-Losavio; Shao Lin; Charlotte M Druschel; Syni-An Hwang; Matthew P Mauer; G Anders Carlson
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 3.  Occupational chemical exposures among cosmetologists: risk of reproductive disorders.

Authors:  Victoria M Pak; Martha Powers; Jianghong Liu
Journal:  Workplace Health Saf       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.413

4.  Fertility disorders and pregnancy complications in hairdressers - a systematic review.

Authors:  Claudia Peters; Melanie Harling; Madeleine Dulon; Anja Schablon; José Torres Costa; Albert Nienhaus
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.646

5.  Musculoskeletal disorders among cosmetologists.

Authors:  Alexandra Tsigonia; Dimitra Tanagra; Athena Linos; Georgios Merekoulias; Evangelos C Alexopoulos
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Reproductive disorders among cosmetologists and hairdressers: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dohyung Kim; Mo-Yeol Kang; Sungyeul Choi; Jaechan Park; Hye-Ji Lee; Eun-A Kim
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.015

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.