Literature DB >> 19383504

Comparing a single case with a control sample: refinements and extensions.

Michael C Corballis1.   

Abstract

Crawford and Garthwaite [Crawford, J. R. & Garthwaite, P. H. (2002). Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: Confidence limits on the abnormality and test score differences. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1196-1208] have proposed an adjusted t-test, widely used in experimental neuropsychology, for comparing a single case with a control sample. This test does not assess whether the single-case score belongs in the population from which the control sample is drawn, but rather whether the mean of the distribution from which the case was drawn differs significantly from the mean of the control population. This approach is readily extended to more complex designs in which the analysis of variance is appropriate, and the single case is treated as belonging to a group of size one. The main qualification in using either this or Crawford and Howell's approach is that it makes the untestable assumption of homogeneity of variance between the two populations, but a simple adjustment either to the t-test or to the analysis of variance allows one to draw conclusions about the relation of the case itself to the control population.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19383504     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  7 in total

1.  Impaired integration of emotional faces and affective body context in a rare case of developmental visual agnosia.

Authors:  Hillel Aviezer; Ran R Hassin; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  The right place at the right time: priming facial expressions with emotional face components in developmental visual agnosia.

Authors:  Hillel Aviezer; Ran R Hassin; Anat Perry; Veronica Dudarev; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Ten common statistical mistakes to watch out for when writing or reviewing a manuscript.

Authors:  Tamar R Makin; Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Statistical analysis in Small-N Designs: using linear mixed-effects modeling for evaluating intervention effectiveness.

Authors:  Robert W Wiley; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 2.773

5.  Normal form from biological motion despite impaired ventral stream function.

Authors:  S Gilaie-Dotan; S Bentin; M Harel; G Rees; A P Saygin
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Attentional bias towards and away from fearful faces is modulated by developmental amygdala damage.

Authors:  Morteza Pishnamazi; Abbas Tafakhori; Sogol Loloee; Amirhossein Modabbernia; Vajiheh Aghamollaii; Bahador Bahrami; Joel S Winston
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Revealing the neural fingerprints of a missing hand.

Authors:  Sanne Kikkert; James Kolasinski; Saad Jbabdi; Irene Tracey; Christian F Beckmann; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Tamar R Makin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 8.140

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.