Literature DB >> 1938283

Variability of high-pass resolution perimetry in normals and patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

M Wall1, J Lefante, M Conway.   

Abstract

High-pass resolution perimetry, or the "ring test," is a recently developed type of acuity perimetry. To determine its test-retest variability, we studied 10 normals and 10 patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) by testing both eyes four separate times. There was no increase in variability from the center out to 21 degrees of visual field eccentricity. However, there was a significant increase from 22 degrees to 29 degrees in both normals and IIH patients. Unlike light sensitivity threshold automated perimetry, with an increase in threshold level there was no significant increase in variability in either normals or patients. This may be because of the test's method, which thresholds by target size rather than intensity. As expected, there was a large intersubject variability in the patients, with the visual fields being significantly disturbed by analysis of total field, quadrants, concentric rings, and anatomic nerve fiber bundle regions. Surprisingly, there was no significant difference in the total within subject variability of normals and patients. Because with the ring test there is no increase in variability with an increase in threshold, this method of perimetry may have great utility for following patients with disturbed visual fields. The ring test appears to have advantages that promote low test-retest variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1938283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  4 in total

Review 1.  High-pass resolution perimetry. A clinical review.

Authors:  L Frisén
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Influence of ageing on visual field defects due to stable lesions.

Authors:  Thiemo Rudolph; Lars Frisén
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Development of a Pediatric Visual Field Test.

Authors:  Marco A Miranda; David B Henson; Cecilia Fenerty; Susmito Biswas; Tariq Aslam
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Binocularly Asymmetric Crowding in Glaucoma and a Lack of Binocular Summation in Crowding.

Authors:  Foroogh Shamsi; Rong Liu; MiYoung Kwon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 4.799

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.