Literature DB >> 19382820

Cost-effectiveness analysis of vaccination against rotavirus with RIX4414 in France.

Baudouin Standaert1, Nathalie Parez, Bertrand Tehard, Xavier Colin, Bruno Detournay.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that annually 300 000 cases of rotavirus-induced gastroenteritis (RVGE) occur in children aged up to 5 years in France. A two-dose vaccine against rotavirus infection (RIX4414; Rotarix, GlaxoSmithKline), has been shown to be highly effective against severe RVGE.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the cost effectiveness of general vaccination against rotavirus using RIX4414 in France.
METHODS: A Markov model simulated RVGE events and the associated outcomes and costs relating to general vaccination of infants against rotavirus infection using RIX4414 (Rotarix) in a birth cohort of children aged up to 5 years in France with a combined adjustment for age distribution with the seasonality of the infection. Costs and outcomes were estimated from a limited societal perspective, including direct medical costs paid out of pocket or by third-party payers, as well as the proportion of direct medical costs reimbursed by the health authorities. Indirect costs were not included in the base-case analysis. The primary outcome measure was the incremental cost per QALY.
RESULTS: Vaccination with RIX4414 incurred an incremental cost of 44 583 Euro per QALY at a public price of 57 Euro per vaccine dose. Univariate sensitivity analyses showed that the parameters with the largest influence on the results were the transition probabilities of severe diarrhoea, seeking medical advice and emergency visits, utility scores of diarrhoea (mild) in children and infants, and the discount rate for benefits. Probabilistic multivariate sensitivity analysis confirmed these results. The acceptability curve indicated that 94% of the results were under an informal threshold of 50 000 Euro per QALY. Comparing our results with those of a recently published study using pooled data for two rotavirus vaccine products in France, the main differences are explained by differences in model structure and in data input values. They include a different age distribution of the infection, shorter duration of the at-risk period (3 years instead of 5 years), different vaccine efficacy, different unit cost data, different disease duration, and different disutility values for the health states in the model. There is a need for agreed standards to improve comparability of results from different studies.
CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that a generalized vaccination strategy with RIX4414 would be cost effective in France from a limited societal perspective, depending on the baseline assumptions for disease progression and on utility scores selected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19382820     DOI: 10.1007/bf03256134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy        ISSN: 1175-5652            Impact factor:   2.561


  14 in total

1.  Complications in hospitalized children with acute gastroenteritis caused by rotavirus: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Petra Kaiser; Michael Borte; Klaus-Peter Zimmer; Hans-Iko Huppertz
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Economics of vaccines revisited.

Authors:  Maarten J Postma; Baudouin A Standaert
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Systematic review of the economic value of diarrheal vaccines.

Authors:  Richard Rheingans; Mirna Amaya; John D Anderson; Poulomy Chakraborty; Jacob Atem
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Comparing cost-effectiveness results for a vaccine across different countries worldwide: what can we learn?

Authors:  Baudouin Standaert; Olivier Ethgen; Rachel Emerson; Maarten Postma; Josephine Mauskopf
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 5.  A critical literature review of health economic evaluations of rotavirus vaccination.

Authors:  Samuel Aballéa; Aurélie Millier; Sibilia Quilici; Stuart Caroll; Stavros Petrou; Mondher Toumi
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Pharmacoeconomic spotlight on rotavirus vaccine RIX4414 (Rotarix™) in developed countries.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2012-12-01

Review 7.  Comparative review of three cost-effectiveness models for rotavirus vaccines in national immunization programs; a generic approach applied to various regions in the world.

Authors:  Maarten J Postma; Mark Jit; Mark H Rozenbaum; Baudouin Standaert; Hong-Anh Tu; Raymond C W Hutubessy
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 8.  Rotavirus vaccine RIX4414 (Rotarix™): a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the prevention of rotavirus gastroenteritis in developed countries.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.558

9.  Economic Evaluation of Human Rotavirus Vaccine in Thailand.

Authors:  Surasak Saokaew; Wasana Prasitsuebsai; Gyneth Lourdes Bibera; Kirati Kengkla; Xu-Hao Zhang; Kyu-Bin Oh; Christa Lee
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2019-06-13

10.  Impact of rotavirus vaccination on hospitalisations in Belgium: comparing model predictions with observed data.

Authors:  Baudouin Standaert; Jorge A Gomez; Marc Raes; Serge Debrus; F Raúl Velázquez; Maarten J Postma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.