Literature DB >> 19382492

CMC packing in functional endoscopic sinus surgery: does it affect patient comfort?

Andreas Leunig1, Christian S Betz, Vanessa Siedek, Konrad G Kastl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) has become the treatment of choice for patients with medically resistant chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS and nasal polyposis). Nasal packing is usually placed after the surgery to minimize mucosal bleeding and support the wound healing process. Both the packing itself and its removal are often associated with pain and discomfort.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) nasal packing on patient comfort following FESS.
METHODS: Forty consecutive patients underwent bilateral FESS. One side of the nasal cavity was packed with CMC (mesh or gel) and the opposite side was not packed, the sides having been randomly selected. Postoperatively, patients were given visual analog scales to rate nasal airway obstruction and headache/pressure separately for the right and left sides. They also rated sleep disturbance and general well-being.
RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the CMC-packed side and the unpacked side with regard to patient comfort. No significant differences were found between CMC mesh and CMC gel.
CONCLUSION: Based on the presented data concerning patient comfort, CMC appears to be an ideal packing material following FESS. However, there is no other study revealing an identical study design focusing on other resorbable packing material. As a consequence, other available resorbable packing material should be investigated to find the ideal packing material following FESS, if packing is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19382492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rhinology        ISSN: 0300-0729            Impact factor:   3.681


  12 in total

Review 1.  Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Rainer K Weber; Werner Hosemann
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

2.  Postoperative pain assessment after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) for chronic pansinusitis.

Authors:  Mira Finkensieper; Katharina Poller; Claus Wittekindt; Winfried Meissner; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  How effective is postoperative packing in FESS patients? A critical analysis of published interventional studies.

Authors:  Petros V Vlastarakos; Emily Iacovou; Melina Fetta; Marios Tapis; Thomas P Nikolopoulos
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Nasal packing and stenting.

Authors:  Rainer K Weber
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-03-10

Review 5.  Absorbable and nonabsorbable packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  Tang-Chuan Wang; Chih-Jaan Tai; Yung-An Tsou; Li-Tai Tsai; Yu-Fen Li; Ming-Hsui Tsai
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy as treatment for lower lacrimal pathway obstructions in adults: Review article.

Authors:  Elina Penttilä; Grigori Smirnov; Henri Tuomilehto; Kai Kaarniranta; Juha Seppä
Journal:  Allergy Rhinol (Providence)       Date:  2015-01

Review 7.  Biodegradable nasal packings for endoscopic sinonasal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maoxiao Yan; Dandan Zheng; Ying Li; Qiaoli Zheng; Jia Chen; Beibei Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Efficacy and Safety of Guardcel Nasal Packing After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Byungjin Kang; Jeong-Rok Kim; Jae-Min Shin; Il-Ho Park; Heung-Man Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.372

9.  Hot saline irrigation in comparison to nasal packing after sinus surgery.

Authors:  Axel Nordström; Mattias Jangard; Marie Svedberg; Helena Kullenberg; Michael Ryott; Maria Kumlin
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-10

10.  Comparison of Early-period Results of Nasal Splint and Merocel Nasal Packs in Septoplasty.

Authors:  Fatih Bingöl; Ali Budak; Eda Şimşek; Korhan Kılıç; Buket Özel Bingöl
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.