Literature DB >> 19382298

Effects of a mandibular advancement device on the upper airway morphology: a cephalometric analysis.

M H J Doff1, A Hoekema, G J Pruim, J H van der Hoeven, L G M de Bont, B Stegenga.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to assess changes in the upper airway morphology associated with an oral appliance in situ in patients suffering from the obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome and to relate these changes to treatment response. Changes in upper airway morphology as a result of an oral appliance were assessed in 52 patients with obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome by means of cephalometric analysis. Lateral cephalograms were taken at baseline and after 2-3 months of treatment. Baseline and follow-up cephalograms were traced twice and cephalometric variables were compared. The predictive value of changes in upper airway morphology for the treatment response was evaluated in univariate and multivariate regression analyses. Oral appliance therapy resulted in an increased posterior airway space at the level of the second vertebra, the uvular tip and the base of the tongue. The increase of the posterior airway space at the level of the second vertebra and the uvular tip were the best predictors for relative improvement of the apnoea-hypopnoea index. However, the predictive value for treatment response of these cephalometric upper airway changes should be interpreted with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19382298     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01946.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  3 in total

1.  Soft palate cephalometric changes with a mandibular advancement device may be associated with polysomnographic improvement in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Hong Joong Kim; Seung-No Hong; Woo Hyun Lee; Jae-Cheul Ahn; Min-Sang Cha; Chae-Seo Rhee; Jeong-Whun Kim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Changes in upper airway width associated with Class II treatments (headgear vs activator) and different growth patterns.

Authors:  Arnim Godt; Bernd Koos; Hanno Hagen; Gernot Göz
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Maximum opening of the mouth by mouth prop during dental procedures increases the risk of upper airway constriction.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ito; Hiroyoshi Kawaai; Shinya Yamazaki; Yosuke Suzuki
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 2.423

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.